- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:08:10 -0400
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
EOWG:
Let's see what we can get done online on the Gallery framework. I think
we've already done most of the brainstorming we need to, but we need to
fine-tune some of the approaches. Please see links and questions below.
Please start any postings on this topic with [Gallery] at the beginning of
the subject line.
Thanks,
- Judy
Premise: We want a gallery of sites that have been _reliably_ reviewed for
accessibility.
Fodder for discussion:
Compilation of disclaimer-type ideas, under "cautionary
approaches" near bottom of page
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/Gallery#cautions
*****Initial sample framework for discussion******
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/Gallery#framework
Background:
Background info on Galleries
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/Gallery
Background on Review Teams (necessary for Gallery)
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/Review.html
Draft description of Review Teams
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/review/reviewteams.html
Changelog for Review Teams
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/review/changelog.html
Questions:
In the draft document section:
*****Initial sample framework for discussion******
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/Gallery#framework
1. Would the disclaimer approach be sensible? effective? feasible?
2. Are the criteria for site inclusion sensible? effective? feasible? etc...
3. Are there better ways to address any of these issues?
4. Other thoughts or comments?
Again, please start any postings on this topic with [Gallery] at the
beginning of the subject line.
Thanks
--
Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 17:12:57 UTC