- From: Helle Bjarnø <hbj@visinfo.dk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:09:40 +0100
- To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
The AUWG site has two different pages listing web authoring tools: 1) http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2002/tools 2) http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/tools and a third named Authoring Tool Conformance Reviews http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/reviews/ . 1) is a table and includes information about reviews; this is also the newest page date February 5 2002. I haven't checked if this page contains more tools than 2) the tools are grouped different on the 2 pages. I'm not on the AU-list but maybe Jan or others from the AUWG can explain the differences and tell us which link we should use in our document? Personally I prefer 1) where you can see all the tools, if there is a review and the date of the review. I haven't checked if the table is accessible. On the web authoring tools document we link to Authoring Tool Conformance Reviews http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/reviews/ here you can't see the date of the reviews in the list, maybe we should ask AU to change the review page to include the information about versions and dates of reviews? Kind regards Helle Bjarno Visual Impairment Knowledge Centre e-mail: hbj@visinfo.dk www.visinfo.dk phone: +45 39 46 01 04, fax: +45 30 61 94 14 mail: Rymarksvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 05:14:36 UTC