- From: Helle Bjarnø <hbj@visinfo.dk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:00:52 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51657A7817A7D3119023009027DE0051179E3E@VIISNY>
I don't think the word "Freeze" is a problem, but can we expect that the person doing this kind of review knows how to "freeze" the generated samples? Would it be better to explain how to collect the samples instead of just saying that one should freeze the pages - maybe my concern is part of me being uncertain about how you guys would "freeze" a representative sample of pages from a web site? Cheers Helle Helle Bjarno Visual Impairment Knowledge Centre e-mail: hbj@visinfo.dk www.visinfo.dk phone: +45 39 46 01 04, fax: +45 30 61 94 14 mail: Rymarksvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark. -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Letourneau [mailto:cpl@starlingweb.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:08 PM To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org Subject: Evaluating Web sites draft: freeze pages? In 2.1 [ http://www.starlingweb.com/wai/eval2.htm#cla <http://www.starlingweb.com/wai/eval2.htm#cla> ] I added (as indicated in the change log): "Note: on web sites with database driven dynamically generated web content, generate broadly representative samples, freeze, and test the output;" Questions: 1a) Will "freeze" be understood? (Will it translate?) 1b) If not, can anyone think of a different (better) way to state this requirement? Regards, Chuck
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2002 07:01:28 UTC