W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Evaluating Web sites draft: freeze pages?

From: Helle BjarnÝ <hbj@visinfo.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:00:52 +0200
Message-ID: <51657A7817A7D3119023009027DE0051179E3E@VIISNY>
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
I don't think the word "Freeze" is a problem, but can we expect  that the
person doing this kind of review knows how to "freeze" the generated
samples? Would it be better to explain how to collect the samples   instead
of just saying that one should freeze the pages - maybe my concern is part
of me being uncertain about how you guys would "freeze" a representative
sample of pages from a web site?
Helle Bjarno
Visual Impairment Knowledge Centre
e-mail: hbj@visinfo.dk
phone: +45 39 46 01 04, fax: +45 30 61 94 14
mail: Rymarksvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Letourneau [mailto:cpl@starlingweb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:08 PM
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Subject: Evaluating Web sites draft: freeze pages?

In 2.1 [ http://www.starlingweb.com/wai/eval2.htm#cla
<http://www.starlingweb.com/wai/eval2.htm#cla>  ]  I added (as indicated in
the change log): 
"Note: on web sites with database driven dynamically generated web content,
generate broadly representative samples, freeze, and test the output;"
1a) Will "freeze" be understood?  (Will it translate?)
1b) If not, can anyone think of a different (better) way to state this

Received on Thursday, 13 June 2002 07:01:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:32 UTC