W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2001

EOWG: Business case draft

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 08:46:19 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Forwarding a message from Jean-Marie D'Amour, about a redraft of the cost

(Jean-Marie, I'm sorry, this had come in through a different email address
than the one registered to the list, and I'd just located it in a
blocked-mail file. I've now added this address to our "master-accept" file,
so you can send from that address in the future.)

- Judy

>Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:43:21 -0500 (EST)
>X-Envelope-From: w3c-wai-eo-request@tux.w3.org  Sat Mar 31 11:43:13 2001
>From: "Jean-Marie D'Amour" <jmdamour@inlb.qc.ca>
>To: "EOWG" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
>Old-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:41:39 -0500
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>Importance: Normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
>X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list
>Subject: [Moderator Action] Business case draft
>X-Diagnostic: Mail coming from a daemon, ignored
>X-Envelope-To: w3c-wai-eo
>Hello William and others,
>I worked on the document and integrate many things added to the change log
>- careful about placement of items. for instance, architecture (in 2nd list)
>might belong in first list also. change transfer rate cost. number of pages,
>dynamic vs. static. variations in user agent support. all could go either
>way. what about creating new list, cost or benefit categories, or other
>considerations (cost or benefits)
>separate out the implementation material from the beginning and move it to
>another part of resource suite
>consider adding some brief elaboration to each item
>- add a brief introduction to cost item list and benefit item list --
>NOTE -- now we want to collapse these
>clarification: new method of providing services will lower cost of providing
>services (for government)
>- add "liability" back in.
>- mention "investment" in intro.
>- collapse cost & benefit items into cost considerations.
>- try to reduce the number of items, for instance, group the training items
>in one category, however preserve the detail as an inline explanation.
>- mention short-term and long-term.
>- remove reference to "corporate" but clarify that it is organizational
>In the "Considerations for cost and benefit" I suggest 4 supercategories (in
>my poor english wording). I think a grouping like this will help to
>understand content.
>I wait for feedback.
>I think I'm not the good person for the brief explanation of each item, but
>i can help and comment.
>Jean-Marie D'Amour
>Camo pour personnes handicapées
>Montréal (Québec) Canada
Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 200 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2001 09:45:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:31 UTC