- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
What we have:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/reviews (and the techniques document)
What we need: More reviews - they are actually pretty time consuming, since
they require reading all three sets of WAI guidelines and a few other things
in many cases, the documentation of the tool, and knowing the tool reasonably
well. But even partial reviews are valuable.
Charles
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Al Gilman wrote:
[I had written]
> And just in case I haven't said it 40 times yet, [presenting the
guidelines
> in a way designers can understand and will follow] means examples,
> examples, examples.
At 03:10 AM 2000-07-04 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>The approach that Al is describing is in fact what the Authoring Tools group
>is working very hard on at the moment.
>
What results do you have that someone else could use at this time, and what
help do you need to do more better faster.
Al
--
Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2000 22:36:45 UTC