W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: usability/accessibility. Yes; examples.

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0007042233250.23305-100000@tux.w3.org>
What we have:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/reviews (and the techniques document)

What we need: More reviews - they are actually pretty time consuming, since
they require reading all three sets of WAI guidelines and a few other things
in many cases, the documentation of the tool, and knowing the tool reasonably
well. But even partial reviews are valuable.

Charles

On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Al Gilman wrote:

  [I had written]
  
  >  And just in case I haven't said it 40 times yet, [presenting the
  guidelines 
  >  in a way designers can understand and will follow] means examples,
  >  examples, examples.
    
  At 03:10 AM 2000-07-04 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  >The approach that Al is describing is in fact what the Authoring Tools group
  >is working very hard on at the moment.
  >
  
  What results do you have that someone else could use at this time, and what
  help do you need to do more better faster.
  
  Al
  

--
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia 
Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2000 22:36:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:47 UTC