- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:40:56 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org, ij@w3.org, chisholm@trace.wisc.edu, dd@w3.org
For waht it's worth (I assume that this lot have gone to the printer now) I would prefer to have 8. Frames: Title frames meaningfully and use _noframes_. Basically I think noframes should be used to provide good quality access to framesets in non-serial media. I would also suggest 10. Validate: Use avaluation tools, guidelines, checklist http:// etc However I am definitiel of the opinion that the value of the quicktips card is more in spreading the message than getting it perfectly accurate - I think there is no chance of doing the latter, but that it is an extremely useful reminder anyway. Charles McCN On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Judy Brewer wrote: VOTES PLEASE! Two items to look at new solutions on; see compiled threads on my last e-mail for background. 8. Frames. Title frames, and provide _NOFRAMES_ equivalent. 10. Check your work. Use evaluation tools, guidelines and checklist www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT - Judy ---------- Judy Brewer jbrewer@w3.org +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 16 July 1999 17:40:58 UTC