- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 10:30:09 -0400 (EDT)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: E & O <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
There is an "s" - I just checked the specification
NOFRAMES
Charles
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Slight change:
Frames: use _noframes_, and meaningful _title_ or _name_ attribute.
(I would drop attribute to fit the line)
Actually, "alt" is also only an example...
Charles
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, William Loughborough wrote:
QuickTips #8:
The argument that only priority 1 items can be on the card is already
broken since "title" attribute is only ever given as an example and
"name" not at all in the checkpoints, therefore "noframe" is just as
permissible.
Proposal:
Frames. Use "noframe"[format shows it as an element]. Use _title_ or
_name_ attribute.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
--Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
--Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 16 July 1999 10:30:13 UTC