Re: Reference card, version 3

> Alan, 
> 
> You did a great job of incorporating as much advice as you possibly could
> after last weeks meeting.  My only suggestion would be a reordering of the
> points (if possible).  I suggest:
> 
> 1.,3.,5.,8.,6.,4.,7.,2.,9.

I actually like the current order better.
 
> This would make the card (more or less) reflect the organization and
> ordering of the corresponding points in the full PA Guideline document.

I understand, but the PA guidelines are richly structured and this
card is more like a flat list, that's why I prefer this order.