- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 11:07:41 +0200
- To: Alan Cantor <acantor@oise.utoronto.ca>
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
> A sans-serif font will be very difficult to read on this scale. Recent studies have shown that serif faces are just faster to read at normal size, but that sans-serif lead to better understanding and overall stronger subjective preference (i.e. people like them better). > World Wide Consortium's (W3C) Web Accessibility Initiative This should be replaced by the W3C + WAI logo (as seen on top of www.w3.org/WAI). > Hand-, eye-, and ear-free features to make your site accessible to people > with disabilities and individuals who have portable devices and slow > connections: I'd rather use an active sentence, i.e. These ... features will make your site... I'd remore the colon and make it an intro. Otherwise I like it (and "portable or slow devices", as Bill said, is shorter) > Hypertext links > Use descriptive hypertext links. Each link should make sense when read > alone or out of context. I think we need to follow some priority order in this list. Link text is not a priority 1 on the PA document, it should come after ALT or FRAME. > Photographs, images & animations > Describe content or purpose within the <Alt="text"> attribute. Create text > alternatives. Please, no "Create text alternatives", it's ambiguous and we don't want people to think we ask them to double their number of pages. > Backgrounds > Choose uncluttered backgrounds and contrasting text and background > colours. Really not important. I'd remove this one. Most if not all UAs support an "ignore author background/foreground" setting nowadays. > Imagemaps > Many people cannot use a mouse. Duplicate imagemap hot spots as a list of > text anchors. Ensure that every link can be activated using keyboard > commands. Duplicate is a bad word :-) We want them to use ALT and client side image map, and if they can't, then a text version. > Tables > Prepare a text-only page that describes its content. Again, no asking for double page as a first order. "Avoid complex table or prepare a text-only..." is fine. > Graphs & charts > Summarize content. Make the raw data available. Instead of "Make the raw data available.", I'd say "Provide a long description". In any case, I think this is too arcane for a business card and can be left out. > Frames > Label each frame with <TITLE>, and include a simplified version of its > content within the <NOFRAMES> attribute. Since <TITLE> or <NAME> can be used, I'd just say "Label each frame, and if too complex, provide a linear version in with <NOFRAMES>. Note that we can save on word/size by skipping attribute (this is an element in this case, not an attribute in fact) > Audio > Prepare audio descriptions, or link to a page that contains > transcripts or descriptions. > > Page organization > Use headings, lists and summaries to make pages easy to scan. I'd move this one on structure right after ALT, as second top. > Evaluate accessibility Evaluate your accessibility is more personal. > Try different browsers; switch off graphics, sounds and animations; > navigate via keyboard, without a mouse; use a monochrome monitor; use > automated analysis tools. Can be shorten: I'd remove "without a mouse" which doesn't add much after mentioning the keyboard, and monochrome monitor. I'd add "use automated and text-only emulation tools". > See www.w3.org/WAI for the complete WAI Page Author Guidelines I like this short closing and the way it is presented on the card.
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 1998 05:08:07 UTC