- From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:36:47 +0000
- To: "Boland Jr, Frederick E." <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- CC: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi Tim, > Minor Questions: Do the categories taken together cover all possible features of the authoring tool? I think so, because we start with the inclusive "For each authoring tool feature" and then carve out the exceptions. I suppose the question for the group is really, should there be any other exceptions? > Do they overlap at all! Yes - a feature might be explained in the UI and the documentation, so it's an inclusive OR. > I assume for c that the feature (service) is explained (documented) elsewhere? One would hope, but even if it isn't on a particular platform, it's an issue of division of responsibility. Applications shouldn't have to document their platforms. > Also what constitutes a sufficient explanation for testing purposes? That would be hard to specify normatively. We can provide a bit more information in the informative intent. BTE: There similar requirement in the new draft Section 508 refresh (http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/refresh/draft-rule.htm#_Toc310327603) Cheers, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jrichards@ocadu.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://idrc.ocad.ca/ Faculty of Design | OCAD University From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. [mailto:frederick.boland@nist.gov] Sent: January 12, 2012 9:52 AM To: Richards, Jan Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org Subject: RE: ATAG2 Action item re: documenting features Thanks - good work Minor Questions: Do the categories taken together cover all possible features of the authoring tool? Do they overlap at all! I assume for c that the feature (service) is explained (documented) elsewhere? Also what constitutes a sufficient explanation for testing purposes? Tim Boland From: Richards, Jan [mailto:jrichards@ocadu.ca] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:17 PM To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org Subject: ATAG2 Action item re: documenting features On Monday's call I took this action: "JR to To propose something for A.4.2.1 that includes user interactive features and a note on platform conventions being documented elsewhere" Here's my proposal (affecting both A.4.2.1 and A.4.2.2). I've tried to move to "explain" from "document" to avoid appearing to require a formal help system: A.4.2.1 Explain Accessibility Features: For each authoring tool feature that is used to meet Part A of ATAG 2.0, at least one of the following is true: (a) Explained in documentation: use of the feature is explained in the authoring tool's documentation; or (b) Explained in interface: use of the feature is explained in the user interface; or (c) Platform service: the feature is a service provided by an underlying platform; or (d) Not used by authors: the feature is not used directly by authors (e.g., passing information to a platform accessibility service) Note: The accessibility of the documentation is covered by Guideline A.1.1 and Guideline A.1.2. A.4.2.1 Explain All Features: For each authoring tool feature, at least one of the following is true: (a) Explained in documentation: use of the feature is explained in the authoring tool's documentation; or (b) Explained in interface: use of the feature is explained in the user interface; or (c) Platform service: the feature is a service provided by an underlying platform; or (d) Not used by authors: the feature is not used directly by authors (e.g., passing information to a platform accessibility service) Note: The accessibility of the documentation is covered by Guideline A.1.1 and Guideline A.1.2. EXISTING TEXT: A.4.2.1 Document Accessibility Features: All features of the authoring tool @@that are used to must be present to meet Part A of ATAG 2.0 (e.g., keyboard shortcuts, text search) are documented. (Level A) Note: The accessibility of the documentation is covered by Guideline A.1.1 and Guideline A.1.2. A.4.2.2 Document All Features: The authoring tool includes documentation for its author-level user interface features. (Level AA) Note: The accessibility of the documentation is covered by Guideline A.1.1 and Guideline A.1.2. Cheers, Jan (MR) JAN RICHARDS PROJECT MANAGER INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC) T 416 977 6000 x3957 F 416 977 9844 E jrichards@ocadu.ca Twitter @OCAD Facebook www.facebook.com/OCADUniversity OCAD UNIVERSITY 205 Richmond Street West, 2nd Floor, Toronto, Canada M5V 1V3 www.ocadu.ca idrc.ocadu.ca
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 16:38:47 UTC