- From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 11:47:27 -0400
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Minutes:
Text of Minutes:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
02 May 2011
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2011/05/02-au-irc
Attendees
Present
Alessandro, Alex, Cherie, Jutta, Jeanne
Regrets
Jan, Sarah, Tim
Chair
Jutta
Scribe
Jeanne
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Level AA Success Criteria Comments
2. [5]ATAG Implementations
* [6]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 02 May 2011
<scribe> scribe: Jeanne
Level AA Success Criteria Comments
Jutta: What is the best course for completing the review of the Last
Call Comments
Alex: A survey helps with this information. Having all the
information on one page would be more convenient.
Jutta: Or a table with a column for comments
ATAG Implementations
Alessandro: I will be ready to discuss this in a few weeks.
Jutta: NIAC is working on mobile web apps which would include
authoring tools. I am approaching them about ATAG 2.0
implementation. It is an organization that helps with device
independents. Device independence often can lead to accessibility.
... We will need two examples of every success criteria when we
reach the CR phase. It is also an advantage to have implementations
that meet all of Level A, level AA and level AAA.
... The homework is to complete the Level AA and AAA comments so we
can review them rapidly next week. We are falling behind in
completing the review. There will come a point where we will have to
send out the comments regardless of review by the WG.
... Next meeting is next Monday.
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 15:47:48 UTC