- From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:03:26 -0400
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
This was an interesting presentation I attended at CSUN 2011 comparing accessibility of 4 different Learning Management Systems: Blackboard, Desire2Learn, Moodle, and SAKAI. They did the evaluation based on their own ideas of what constituted accessibility, but the results may be of some interest. jeanne -------- Original Message -------- Subject: CSUN presentation on LMS Accessibility Comparison Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:16:54 -0500 From: Rangin, Hadi Bargi <hadi@illinois.edu> To: Rangin, Hadi Bargi <hadi@illinois.edu> CC: petri.1@osu.edu <petri.1@osu.edu>, Marc Thompson <thompso1@uiuc.edu>, Richwine, Brian L <brichwin@indiana.edu> Hello everyone, My sincerest apologies for the delay, but finally the paper on LMS accessibility is here. My colleagues and I would like to underscore that this is an ongoing project, and some of the testing is still in progress and/or under investigation. We welcome your feedback on this project. We are considering expanding this kind of accessibility/usability evaluation to other products, such as library resources, communication systems, e-mail systems, etc. If you find such projects helpful, it would be great if you could also help us in these efforts. Please drop me a note if you are interested in helping enhance the criteria, performing accessibility/usability testing for any of these LMS. Here is the link to the paper. Once you are on that page, you might want to open the LMS-specific results in new browser tab/window (control+enter or shift+enter respectively): A Comparison of Learning Management System Accessibility<http://devserv.dres.uiuc.edu/ita/hadi/citaweb/presentations/2011-03-17-csun/> Thanks, Hadi
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 02:03:42 UTC