- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:29:56 -0500
- CC: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi all, My trouble with the term "option" starts with the definition: "Option: When an author is presented with choices. An option may be local (e.g., prompting whether to save before ending an authoring session) or global (e.g., preference settings)." We never use the local and global parts so part that does any work is: "Option: When an author is presented with choices." but actually this isn't even exactly right. For example: B.2.2.7 Save Status for Repair: If repair assistance is not provided during checking, then the author(s) have the OPTION to save a list of web content accessibility problems to facilitate later repair. (Level AA) What we really mean is that the author(s) have a choice to save or even simpler, can save. This is how WCAG 2.0 (sometimes) phrases things: WCAG20: 2.2.5 Re-authenticating: When an authenticated session expires, the user can continue the activity without loss of data after re-authenticating. (Level AAA) And how ATAG 2.0 often phrases things: A.3.1.5 Customize Keyboard Access: Keyboard access to the authoring tool can be customized. ===================== Below I include all of the requirements that include the word option. Where it could possibly mean anything other than "choice" I suggest rewordings: ====================== Here is how we might eliminate the term from the normative guidelines: A.3.3.1 Static View Option: Rendering of time-based content (e.g., animations) in editing views can be turned off. (Level A) [Implementing A.3.3.1] A.3.6.4 Options Assistance: The authoring tool includes a mechanism to help the author(s) configure any options related to Part A of this document. (Level AAA) ==> A.3.6.4 PREFERENCES Assistance: The authoring tool includes a mechanism to help the author(s) configure any PREFERENCE SETTINGS related to Part A of this document. (Level AAA) B.1.2.2 End Product Cannot Preserve Accessibility Information: If the web content technology of the output of a web content transformation cannot preserve recognized accessibility information (WCAG 2.0 Level A), then at least one of the following are true: (Level A) (a) Option to Save: the authoring tool provides the author(s) with the option to save the accessibility information in another way (e.g., as a "comment", as a backup copy of the input); or (b) Warning: the authoring tool notifies the author(s) that this will result in web content accessibility problems in the output. B.1.2.4 Notification Prior to Deletion: If the authoring tool automatically deletes any author-generated content for any reason, then at least one of the following is true: (Level AA) (a) Preserve Accessibility Information: the authoring tool only automatically deletes web content that it can detect is not accessibility information; or (b) Notification Option: the author(s) have the option to receive notification before deletion; or (c) No Deletion Option: the author(s) have the option to prevent automatic deletion by the authoring tool. B.2.1.1 Decision Support: If the authoring tool provides the author(s) with a choice between web content technology options, then the following information is provided for each option: (Level A) [Implementing B.2.1.1] (a) General Information: general information about the accessibility of the technology to end users; and (b) For "Included Technologies": for technologies included in a conformance claim, information on the accessible content support features provided for that technology by the authoring tool; and (c) For "Excluded Technologies": for technologies excluded from a conformance claim, both a warning that choosing that technology may result in web content accessibility problems and information on alternative included technologies (if available). ==> B.2.1.1 Decision Support: If the authoring tool provides the author(s) with a choice between web content technologies, then the following information is provided for each option: (Level A) [Implementing B.2.1.1] (a) General Information: general information about the accessibility of the technology to end users; and (b) For "Included Technologies": for technologies included in a conformance claim, information on the accessible content support features provided for that technology by the authoring tool; and (c) For "Excluded Technologies": for technologies excluded from a conformance claim, both a warning that choosing that technology may result in web content accessibility problems and information on alternative included technologies (if available). B.2.2.7 Save Status for Repair: If repair assistance is not provided during checking, then the author(s) have the option to save a list of web content accessibility problems to facilitate later repair. (Level AA) B.2.2.8 Metadata for Discovery: If the authoring tool records the accessibility status of web content, then the author(s) have the option to associate this status with the content as metadata to facilitate resource discovery by end users. (Level AA) B.2.2.9 Metadata for Repair: If repair assistance is not provided during checking, then the author(s) have the option to save a metadata listing of the web content accessibility problems to facilitate interoperability with external repair tools. (Level AAA) B.2.4.4 Save for Reuse: The author(s) have the option of having any recognized plain text alternative content that they enter (e.g., short text labels, long descriptions) stored for future reuse. (Level AA) B.2.5.2 Provide Accessible Templates: If the authoring tool provides templates, then there are accessible template options for a range of template uses. (Level A) B.2.5.4 Template Selection Mechanism: If the author(s) are provided with a template selection mechanism, then both of the following are true: (Level AA) [Implementing B.2.5.4] (a) Indicate: The selection mechanism indicates the accessibility status of templates (if known); and (b) Prominence: Any accessible template options are at least as prominent as other template options. B.2.5.5 New Templates: If the author(s) can use the authoring tool to create new templates for use by a template selection mechanism, they have the option to record the accessibility status of the new templates. (Level AA) B.2.5.6 Pre-Authored Content Selection Mechanism: If the author(s) are provided with a selection mechanism for pre-authored content other than templates (e.g., clip art gallery, widget repository, design themes), then both of the following are true: (Level AA) (a) Indicate: The selection mechanism indicates the accessibility status of the pre-authored content (if known); and (b) Prominence: Any accessible options are at least as prominent as other pre-authored content options. B.3.1.1 Accessible Options Prominent (WCAG Level A,AA,AAA): If the author(s) are provided with multiple options for an authoring task, options that will result in web content conforming to WCAG 2.0 Level A are at least as prominent as options that will not. (Level A) B.3.1.1 Accessible Options Prominent (WCAG Level A,AA,AAA): If the author(s) are provided with multiple options for an authoring task, options that will result in web content conforming to WCAG 2.0 Level A are at least as prominent as options that will not. (Level A) ==> B.3.1.1 Accessible Options Prominent (WCAG Level A,AA,AAA): If the author(s) are provided with a choice of authoring actions for achieving the same authoring outcome (e.g., styling text), then options that will result in web content conforming to WCAG 2.0 Level A are at least as prominent as options that will not. (Level A) B.3.2.2 Reactivate Option: If the author(s) turn off an accessible content support feature, then they can always turn the feature back on. (Level A) Cheers, Jan -- (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. jan.richards@utoronto.ca | 416-946-7060 Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) Faculty of Information | University of Toronto
Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 21:30:25 UTC