- From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:51:45 -0500
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes
IRC Log:
http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-irc
Text of Minutes:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WAI AU
23 Nov 2009
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009OctDec/0040.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-irc
Attendees
Present
Tim, Sueann, Jan, Jeanne
Regrets
Jutta_T., Ann_M.
Chair
Jan Richards
Scribe
Jeanne
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Organizing reviews
2. [6]Drawing issue for A.3.1.5 Keyboard
3. [7]UAAG2 update
4. [8]Reviews
* [9]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<Jan> zakm, code?
<Jan> Scribe: Jeanne
Organizing reviews
Cynthia Shelly will be doing the reviews for PF and we will get it
"mid December".
SN: IBM is doing theirs.
GP: I'm encouraging 2 from Adobe (Matt and Andrew) to do reviews.
... What version should we be using?
Drawing issue for A.3.1.5 Keyboard
<Greg> Use the editors draft keyboard issue may change and other
minor edits, nothing material
JR: there are minor changes since WD, but they do not affect the
document in any material way.
GP: Adobe raised an objection: was it written to apply that all
conceivable actions that can be done with the mouse be done with the
keyboard at low a priority.
... and that everything had to be done with keyboard.
... we like the new language that Jan wrote, and accept that
revision.
JR: I will put it in the document marked for decision by the group
in a couple weeks.
<Jan> ACTION: JR to add Keyboard access to drafts makerd as New text
requiring WG decision [recorded in
[10]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-196 - Add Keyboard access to drafts makerd
as New text requiring WG decision [on Jan Richards - due
2009-11-30].
UAAG2 update
<Jan> JS: Pysched about where UAAG2 is
<Jan> JS: Some sections need work
<Jan> JS: Most sections ready
<Jan> JS: Think UAAG2 is 85-90% there
<Jan> JS: At recent F2F we did a lot of work on Understanding UAAG
2.0 doc
<Jan> JS: Feeling much more hopeful that LC is nearer than further
Reviews
<scribe> ACTION: JS to check W3C procedures to confirm procedures
for linking directly into the WCAG2 document. [recorded in
[11]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-197 - Check W3C procedures to confirm
procedures for linking directly into the WCAG2 document. [on Jeanne
Spellman - due 2009-11-30].
<Jan> ACTION: JR ok to add Related Resources for Success Criterion
A.1.1.1...JS to check on procdure for specific linking [recorded in
[12]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-198 - Ok to add Related Resources for
Success Criterion A.1.1.1...JS to check on procdure for specific
linking [on Jan Richards - due 2009-11-30].
JR: Search new version of Implementing ATAG2.0 for "@@". A.1.1.1
... Tim had suggested links to WCAG in the related resources that
are more detailed.
... Is this what you are thinking of?
TB: Yes, although it would be better to link directly into the
document.
JR: Jeanne is looking into that.
<Jan> ACTION: JR ok to add Related Resources for Success Criterion
A.2.1.1 [recorded in
[13]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-199 - Ok to add Related Resources for
Success Criterion A.2.1.1 [on Jan Richards - due 2009-11-30].
<Jan> ACTION: TB to Make sure JR's Related Resources WCAG section
references are OK. [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - TB
<scribe> ACTION: TB to Make sure JR's Related Resources WCAG section
references are OK. [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action06]
<scribe> ACTION: TB to Make sure JR's Related Resources WCAG section
references are OK. [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - TB
tion: FB to Make sure JR's Related Resources WCAG section references
are OK.
<Jan> ACTION: JR ok to change example wording under B.1.2.1
[recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action08]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-200 - Ok to change example wording under
B.1.2.1 [on Jan Richards - due 2009-11-30].
<scribe> ACTION: TB to Make sure JR's Related Resources WCAG section
references are OK. [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action09]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - TB
<scribe> ACTION: FB to Make sure JR's Related Resources WCAG section
references are OK. [recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action10]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-201 - Make sure JR's Related Resources
WCAG section references are OK. [on Frederick Boland - due
2009-11-30].
<Jan> ACTION: JR ok to add new example wording under B.1.2.2
[recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action11]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-202 - Ok to add new example wording under
B.1.2.2 [on Jan Richards - due 2009-11-30].
<Jan> ACTION: JR ok to add new example wording under B.1.3.1
[recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action12]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-203 - Ok to add new example wording under
B.1.3.1 [on Jan Richards - due 2009-11-30].
<Jan> ACTION: JR ok to add Related Resources for Success Criterion
B.2.4.1 [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action13]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-204 - Ok to add Related Resources for
Success Criterion B.2.4.1 [on Jan Richards - due 2009-11-30].
JR: If anyone knows anyone who is using ARIA tools to make ARIA
easier? It would be good to use it as an example.
TB: Have you talked to PF about it?
JR: Not about this specifically, but I will follow up in my
conversations with PF.
... If we get more comments, we may go to 2-hour calls.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: FB to Make sure JR's Related Resources WCAG section
references are OK. [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action10]
[NEW] ACTION: JR ok to add new example wording under B.1.2.2
[recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action11]
[NEW] ACTION: JR ok to add new example wording under B.1.3.1
[recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action12]
[NEW] ACTION: JR ok to add Related Resources for Success Criterion
A.1.1.1...JS to check on procdure for specific linking [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: JR ok to add Related Resources for Success Criterion
A.2.1.1 [recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: JR ok to add Related Resources for Success Criterion
B.2.4.1 [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action13]
[NEW] ACTION: JR ok to change example wording under B.1.2.1
[recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action08]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to add Keyboard access to drafts makerd as New text
requiring WG decision [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to check W3C procedures to confirm procedures for
linking directly into the WCAG2 document. [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/23-au-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 21:52:06 UTC