- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:28:59 -0500
- To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi all, Last week we approved the following term and definition: equivalent alternative Content that is used in place of other content that a person may not be able to access. An equivalent alternative fulfills essentially the same function or purpose as the original content. Examples include text alternatives for non-text content, captions for audio, audio descriptions for video, sign language for audio, media alternatives for time-based media. See WCAG for more information I then took the def'n to UAWG in an attempt to synchronize our terms... UAWG liked the definition approach (e.g., letting WCAG set the specifics), but they decided to use the term "alternative content" instead since there was a feeling that nothing is truly equivalent. That actually agrees well with WCAG 2.0 (which has terms like: "alternative for time-based media", "conforming alternate version", "media alternative for text", and "text alternative"). So what do people think of doing the same in ATAG 2.0? (Jeanne can you please put this on the survey?) Cheers, Jan -- Jan Richards, M.Sc. User Interface Design Lead Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) Faculty of Information (i-school) University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 20:29:37 UTC