RE: AUWG Poll #3: 21 September 2007 (only 4 items)

1) A: Accept the Proposal 

2) A: Accept the Proposal

3) B: Accept the proposal with changes: Grammar: Change first sentence
in Note 1 from "The requirements below are not applicable if authors
have specifically allowed the introduction accessibility problem(s)
(e.g., by setting less strict preferences)." to "The requirements below
are not applicable if authors have specifically allowed the introduction
of accessibility problem(s) (e.g., by setting less strict preferences)."
(Insert the word of after "introduction").

4) A: Accept the Proposal

Greg Pisocky | Adobe Systems | 703-883-2810 p | 703-678-3541 m
gpisocky@adobe.com 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jan Richards
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:05 PM
> To: WAI-AUWG List
> Subject: AUWG Poll #3: 21 September 2007 (only 4 items)
> 
> 
> AUWG Poll #3:
> 
> -----
> 
> Instructions:
> 
> - Proposed rewordings, issues etc. are listed.
> 
> - Members in good standing (http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/members) 
> have the following "response" options:
>     A: Accept the proposal
>     B: Accept the proposal with the changes (then specify changes)
>     C: Do not accept the proposal (then specify reason)
> 
> - Once 3 people have accepted a proposal (assume my vote is 
> to accept unless noted) and none have rejected it, I'll start 
> a 3 day timer. If the timer expires with no rejections then 
> the proposal is assumed to be carried
> 
> - to keep things organized, please respond to the poll as a 
> whole rather than to individual questions.
> 
> -----
> 
> Proposal 1: Guideline B.1.1: Modified wording, New Note 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070921/WD-ATAG20-200
> 70921.html#check-prefer-w3c
> 
> Response: ??
> 
> -----
> 
> Proposal 2: Guideline B.1.2: Modified wording ("have the 
> option to") 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070921/WD-ATAG20-200
> 70921.html#check-leave-access-content
> 
> Response: ??
> 
> -----
> 
> Proposal 3: Guideline B.1.3: Modified wording of SCs and 
> Notes - hoping to increase clarity around what needs to be 
> automatically accessible.
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070921/WD-ATAG20-200
> 70921.html#check-generate-access-markup
> 
> Response: ??
> 
> -----
> 
> Proposal 4: Definition of "content generation".
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070921/WD-ATAG20-200
> 70921.html#def-Content-Generation
> 
> Response: ??
> 
> -----
> 
> End of Poll #3
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Jan
> 
>

Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 19:45:35 UTC