- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:54:15 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Started my review. Seems OK so far.. From Editors' draft: Techniques B.1.1-1.1, B.1.1-2.1, and B.1.1-2.2 - all mention "WCAG" in "benchmark document" reference (I thought there was an issue with this as a result of recent joint ATAG-WCAG call)? Also, for Technique B.1.1-2.1, first sentence, I would say "providing at least one content type that has a 'benchmark document'" instead of the language currently there (which seems awkward to me)? Technique B.1.1-General.1 - mentions "WCAG" (see previous note) For Technique B.1.2-1.1, should we say "accessibility information of the resulting content" rather than just "resulting content" (if that's what we more precisely mean..) Will try to continue if I have time.. Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST PS - I will be away April 1 - April 6
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 13:06:03 UTC