- From: Barry Feigenbaum <feigenba@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:49:58 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFC3EE483D.7A628A76-ON86257260.007C6B0E-86257260.007D6E73@us.ibm.com>
Agreed on F2F. I assume March is earliest we can do it. right? I am not available the week of March 5. Will WCAG be "revised" LC by then? Shouldn't we should delay until WCAG reaches this state before we release a LC. Andi Snow-Weaver was (independently) stating the need for a "partial credit" scheme as I have tried several times in the past to get. I know having some hard minimums of support is good for accessibility, but not always practical from a tool vendor point of view. For example, creating an accessible tool is quite independent from creating a tool that makes accessible content. Achieving either is difficult, but getting no level of compliance with only one of these achieved seems not satisfactory. PS I have asked for a general review by IBMers (beyond Becky Gibson). That will not time out by the stated deadline but should be ready by any F2F. Barry A. Feigenbaum, Ph. D. Tool Architect Human Ability and Accessibility Center - IBM Research www.ibm.com/able, w3.ibm.com/able voice 512-838-4763/tl678-4763 fax 512-838-9367/0330 cell 512-799-9182 feigenba@us.ibm.com Mailstop 904/5F-021 11400 Burnet Rd., Austin TX 78758 Accessibility ARB Representative on SWG ARB W3C AUWG Representative Austin IBM Club BoD Interface Technologies IDT Member QSE Development TopGun Sun Certified Java Programmer, Developer & Architect IBM Certified XML Developer; OOAD w/UML This message sent with 100% recycled electrons Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca> Sent by: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org 01/11/2007 04:21 PM To w3c-wai-au@w3.org cc Subject Re: Joint call with WCAG-WG - 11 January 2006 Hi all, I thought that call went quite well. At this point, I think the pile of comments is big enough to justify another F2F - the goal of which would be a Last Call WD. Thoughts? Cheers, Jan
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2007 22:50:19 UTC