- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:18:53 +0200
- To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi Jan, At 16:59 19/06/2007, Jan Richards wrote: >On yesterday's AUWG call I took an action item to consider how ATAG >2.0's "Web Content Accessibility Benchmark" relates to WCAG 2.0's >"Accessibility Supported". > >URLs: >http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070615/WD-ATAG20-20070615.html#conf-benchmark >http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#accessibility-support > > >NOTE: I will use "technology/content-type" since these different >terms are used in pretty much the same way (more on that later). > > >SOME INTERESTING PARALLELS: > >(...) > >POSSIBILITIES FOR SYNCHRONIZATION: > >1. ATAG 2.0 and WCAG 2.0 should use a common term for >technology/content-type. AUWG's problem with the current WCAG 2.0 >definition of "technology" ("markup language, programming language, >style sheet, data format, or API ") is the appearance of the term >"API" in the list. For the record, ATAG 2.0's current definition of >"content-type" is "A data format, programming or markup language >that is intended to be retrieved and rendered by a user agent (e.g., >HTML, CSS, SVG, PNG, PDF, Flash, JavaScript or combinations).". Two notes about the definition of "technology" in WCAG 2.0: * the glossary entry is not referenced from anywhere else in the document, so it doesn't follow the "style guide"; * the definition is actually an enumeration instead of a proper definition, so we need something else. Maybe WCAG could take "API" out of the definition of "technology", and say "technology" or "technology and/or API" in the rest of the document depending on which is the intended meaning in the context. Best regards, Christophe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 15:19:07 UTC