RE: Notes form Sept 11 AUWG conference call

Hi Roberto,

Good idea. Would you like to take on one or more of these?

Cheers,
Jan


Quoting Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>:

> Hi Jan,
> What about the plug-ins like Xstandard, Java Editors, etc. ?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Jan Richards
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 10:25 PM
> To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
> Subject: Notes form Sept 11 AUWG conference call
> 
> 
> 
> Attendees:
> - Jan Richards
> - Greg Pisocky
> - Tim Boland
> 
> The three of us agreed that a good way to move forward on the techniques
> would 
> be for each member to choose a particular authoring tool (or authoring 
> function - e.g. the code editing view of a tool that also offers a WYSIWYG 
> view) and go through the techniques from the perspective of that tool (you
> may 
> choose to take the view of the developer, the buyer, etc.). The idea is to 
> really focus on the applicability statements and techniques - is anything 
> inaccurate or missing? Do the icons provide a useful guide or not?
> 
> In order to avoid duplication, please register your intent on the mailing 
> list. Here's a list of possible perspectives (others are possible):
> 
> WYSIWYG tool (e.g. Dreamweaver's WYSIWYG view)
> Code level tool
> Object-Oriented tool (e.g. Visio)
> Indirect authoring tool (e.g. Desire2Learn)
> 
> Cheers,
> Jan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ended early (4:20 ET)
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 02:47:14 UTC