- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:27:06 -0400
- To: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- CC: "'List (WAI-AUWG)'" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi Roberto, I only commented out the checklist until it is updated. Cheers, Jan Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote: > Hi, > In part 1, there is no more listed the checklist? Did we need to update the > old one or will be definitively removed? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Jan Richards > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:59 PM > To: List (WAI-AUWG) > Cc: Judy Brewer > Subject: Getting ready to publish public working draft of ATAG 2.0 > > > I have attached the ATAG 2.0 document that I have been preparing to > publish as a public working draft. (hopefully for the end of the week if > the Technology vs Content Type issue is worked out, see below) > > There have been a few changes that probably that rise above the level of > being editorial: > > - the changes already stated in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2005OctDec/0010.html > > - the status section has been reworked to conform with pub rules. > > - section "1.5 Relationship with other guidelines and standards" has > been greatly shortened and now primarily points to the new WAI > components doc. > > - checkpoint A.1.? proposed in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2005JulSep/0080.html > has been added as proposed text. > > - the "Note for Web-Based tools" have been moved into the Success > Criteria box as "For Web-Based Interface Components" because they are > normative. > > And as a bonus - I have updated the last call comment table to explain > all of our responses to the issues raised at that time. (see attached) > > If ANY of these changes is a concern, please send a message to the list. > > ************************************************************************* > > We still need a decision on Technology vs. Content Type! The biggest pro > for "technology" is that it is the term that WCAG uses. > > At the moment all of the body text is "Content Type" but I won't changed > the glossary entry until there is resolution. > > ************************************************************************* > > Cheers, > Jan > -- Jan Richards, M.Sc. User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) Faculty of Information Studies University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Monday, 24 October 2005 14:30:29 UTC