- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:30:56 -0400
- To: "List (WAI-AUWG)" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <43297790.2010806@utoronto.ca>
In an effort to clean up ATAG's Part A prior to the F2F, I propose the following: (see attached for how it would look in the draft) - break up "A.?.1 Ensure that browser-accessed functionality conforms to WCAG" and add it as applicable to the success criteria of other requirements: A.1.1, A.1.2, A.1.3, A.2.2, A.2.3, A.2.4, A.2.7, A.3.2, A.4.1. I propose this because simply requiring all of WCAG in a checkpoint goes beyond what is required of tools that are not Web-based. - move "A.?.2 Provide personalized configuration." into "GUIDELINE A.2: Authoring Interface must be Operable". + BUT actually I'm wondering if this checkpoint is even really necessary. It requires tools to have settings profiles which is nice when tools are used by many users like a public access browser, but maybe not needed in ATAG. - merge "A.?.3 Ensure that documentation is accessible. [RP]" with A.3.4 to produce "A.3.4 Document the authoring interface including all interface accessibility features." while preserving all success criteria. - move "A.?.4 Ensure previews emulate accessible rendering features of browsers." into "GUIDELINE A.2: Authoring Interface must be Operable". Of the four Part A guidelines, I think this is the best fit. + THE ABOVE CHANGES LEAVE A.? EMPTY - so this header can be removed - merge "A.1.4 Ensure that the audio presentation is configurable" into "A.1.3 Ensure that visual displays are configurable" to form "A.1.3 Ensure that all displays are configurable." Conceptually they are the same and the success criteria can include audio, visual and perhaps tactile (if applicable) requirements. - remove "A.1.5 Ensure enhanced access to multimedia." - let's just cover this stuff in "A.1.2 Provide synchronized alternatives for multimedia." and "A.1.3 Ensure that all displays are configurable." - For "A.1.6 Allow the display preferences for the editing view to be changed without affecting the document markup." break the success criteria implied by "and vice versa" out into "The author must be able to configure the presentation settings of all Web content being edited without affecting the display of the editing view." - Merged "A.2.8 Separate selection from activation." into "A.2.2 Ensure that all functionality is operable via a keyboard or a keyboard interface." preserving the success criteria. ================================================================ Please respond to the list. If I get the sense that there is agreement I can get started on updating the techniques draft to match ahead of the F2F. Cheers, Jan -- Jan Richards, M.Sc. User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) Faculty of Information Studies University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Attachments
- text/html attachment: guidelines_with_Part_A_proposed_changes_.html
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 13:32:12 UTC