- From: Karen Mardahl <karen@mardahl.dk>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:18:53 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi Jan I like your re-wording of 2.2, in general. Technical question: Do you want the definition in parentheses included at this point in the guidelines, or will the term "WCAG-capable" just have an href down to the Glossary? I guess what worries me about the definition of WCAG-capable is - I'm worried there's a catch somewhere. Don't know why, just do! I just dived into the CSS Techniques for WCAG 2.0 (http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-CSS-TECHS-20031219.html) and could not find what I would call explicit references. I.e. checkpoints or guidelines didn't match - you have to do a Find. I expect more from your definition than the other docs can provide. Does that then weaken your definition? Guess that is my real worry. OK this is all just about prioritizing. If there are no WCAG-capable formats available, then the available formats can be in any old order. The tool simply cannot deal with 2.2 if it doesn't have a WCAG-capable format. Would that then imply something about the overall accessibility of the tool? regards, Karen, the confused and puzzled! (Or maybe I am just pedantic and dense?!) -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jan Richards Sent: 27. januar 2004 17:59 To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org Subject: Issue #6: Rationale and success criteria of 2.2 The wording in the most recent internal draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2004/WD-ATAG20-20040120/#check-prefer-w3c is quite good. However, in the interest of clarity, I suggest the following re- wording: 2.2 Give priority to formats that enable the creation of WCAG-conformant content. [Priority 1] Rationale: Some formats are "WCAG-capable", enabling the creation of web content that conforms to WCAG, while other formats may intrinsically preclude this possibility. Giving priority to WCAG-capable formats will increase probability that they are used. Success Criteria: When format selection is automatic, the selected format must be WCAG-capable. When format selection is performed by the author, the most prominent format(s) must be WCAG-capable. (A format is WCAG-capable when a WCAG techniques document that explains how to meet each applicable WCAG checkpoint has been published and explicitly referenced.)
Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 12:19:47 UTC