- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:07:23 -0500
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Great job! While we're talking about definitions, I for my own education looked up some of our terms in dictionary as follows: Webster's II New Riverside Dictionary, 1996 - typical - 1. exhibiting the essential traits and characteristics of a kind, class or group 2. of or relating to a representative specimen:characteristic 3. conforming to or being a type use - 1. to put into action or service - employ for some purpose 2. employ regularly implication -> user - one who does the above author - 1. someone who writes a literary work 2. someone who creates or originates anything tool - 1. an implement or machine used to do work or to perform a task 2. something regarded as necessary to the performance of one's occupational or professional tasks 3. one utilized to carry out the designs of another As we talk about glossary/definition issues, perhaps keeping the above in mind might be helpful (as a kind of "reference" for perspective? Best, Tim Boland NIST At 03:35 PM 1/27/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Hi everyone, > >I have attached an idea for bringing together our two sets of categories: the >tool types under the "definition of authoring tool" in the ATAG Guidelines >and >the tool categories we use in the ATAG Techniques. > >The idea is still rough, but I'd like to hear what people think. > >Cheers, >Jan > >-- >Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist >Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto > > Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca > Web: http://ultrajuan.ic.utoronto.ca/jan/richards.html > Phone: 416-946-7060 > Fax: 416-971-2896 > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 11:08:41 UTC