- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:07:23 -0500
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Great job! While we're talking about definitions, I for my own education
looked up some of our terms in dictionary as follows:
Webster's II New Riverside Dictionary, 1996 -
typical - 1. exhibiting the essential traits and characteristics of a kind,
class or group
2. of or relating to a representative specimen:characteristic
3. conforming to or being a type
use - 1. to put into action or service - employ for some purpose
2. employ regularly
implication -> user - one who does the above
author - 1. someone who writes a literary work
2. someone who creates or originates anything
tool - 1. an implement or machine used to do work or to perform a task
2. something regarded as necessary to the performance of one's
occupational or
professional tasks
3. one utilized to carry out the designs of another
As we talk about glossary/definition issues, perhaps keeping the above in
mind might
be helpful (as a kind of "reference" for perspective?
Best, Tim Boland NIST
At 03:35 PM 1/27/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>I have attached an idea for bringing together our two sets of categories: the
>tool types under the "definition of authoring tool" in the ATAG Guidelines
>and
>the tool categories we use in the ATAG Techniques.
>
>The idea is still rough, but I'd like to hear what people think.
>
>Cheers,
>Jan
>
>--
>Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist
>Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto
>
> Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
> Web: http://ultrajuan.ic.utoronto.ca/jan/richards.html
> Phone: 416-946-7060
> Fax: 416-971-2896
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 11:08:41 UTC