- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:24:04 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
- Message-ID: <1075213444.40167484b61c9@webmail.utoronto.ca>
Hello everyone, An updated version of the ATAG Issues document is attached to this message. Our immediate concern are the 8 Unresolved Guidelines issues: 1. Definitions needed for a number of terms. (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2004JanMar/0007.html) 2. Concept of "typical user" in success criteria may be unclear. 3. Concept of a "usability STUDY override" to normative requirements for conformance (success criteria) still undecided (connected with idea of typical user)? 4. Functional spec or usability-oriented guide? Is ATAG a document that specifies programmatic requirements, or one that directs the outcome (related to usability override)? 5. Where will Definition of Authoring Tool example images "live" (in the guidelines or techniques) - currently they have been moved to the techniques? 6. Handling non-W3C formats - Rationale and success criteria of 2.2 7. There may be insufficient attention paid to Web-based authoring environments 8. New editorial additions require group approval. ========== Please send your proposals for addressing these issues to the list. The more issues we can resolve on the list, the less we need to resolve on the next call (2 Feb 2004). ========== Cheers, Jan -- Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Attachments
- text/xml attachment: Issues.html
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2004 20:32:47 UTC