- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:23:13 -0400
- To: "List (WAI-AUWG)" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
My action item for 4.3 was to replace "accessibility related
functionalities" with a list of the relevant functions.
1. Accessibility prompting, checking, repair and documentation functions
must not contrast with other comparable functions in terms of:
- visual design (design metaphors, artistic sophistication, sizes,
fonts, colours)
- operation (degree of automation, approximate number of mouse
clicks or keystrokes to accomplish task)
- complexity (amount of author instruction required), or
- flexibility (configurability of the functionality and its features)
Note. Two examples of comparable functions are (1) an accessibility
checker and a spelling checker and (2) a prompt for an accessibility
related label and a prompt for a document title.
---
ed. Note: I removed Success Criteria (2) because it was not checkable.
P.S.: We need to update the Table of Contents.
--
Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto
Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
Web: http://ultrajuan.ic.utoronto.ca/jan/richards.html
Phone: 416-946-7060
Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 10:23:16 UTC