- From: Liddy Nevile <Liddy.Nevile@motile.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:41:25 +1100
- To: W3C WAI-AU <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
At 15:28pm -0500 2002/03/11, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >I am assuming that the two cases we are talking about are "live production" - >such as webcasting an event as it happens - and synchronous collaborative >authoring, where two or more people are engaged in working on the same >document interactively. yes In the WG meeting this am we were wondering what to call this kind of thing. Carlos said that 'real-time' authoring did not work very well for him. We tried synchronous, instantaneous, etc .. and it is still open, i think. >In many cases this is the same thing we are already talking about, with a >timing constraint of sorts. It is no good to go back afterwards and fix >everything, but it is possible in both kinds of cases that one person is >specifically responsible for a given type of content. > >For example, the people who provide voice commentary for TV coverage of an >event are rarely the people who provide the real-time captioning, nor is >their voice commentary used as radio commentary - since the needs of the >audiences are different, there are different commentators. On >http://www.cricinfo.com there are real-time streams of text commentary, and >often of radio commentary as well (and sometimes even of video with >commentary!). > >In the case of synchronous collaborative work, it might be helpful to think >of a meeting. Many of us in this group have been at meetings where there were >people simultaneously providing sign language or text interpretation of >voice, voice descriptions of images, etc. > >So I guess one of the things we need to look for is tools that support >generating content in formats that can handle a variety of concurrent forms >(things like SMIL and SVG spring to mind), and techniques that tools can >apply to enable the joint or solo production of those forms concurrently. > I think that Charles' ideas here are going to be useful to explain what we are talking about, whatever word/s we choose. And we are in need of techniques, so this input is helpful.
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 15:42:56 UTC