- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:45:44 -0500 (EST)
- To: Liddy Nevile <Liddy.Nevile@motile.net>
- cc: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Actually Dreamweaver is one of the few editors that has a serious WYSIWYG adn Code editing tool, and that only really in the latest version. Many code editing tools have no WYSIWYG editing facility - just a browser preview. In plenty of cases, of course, there will be tools that do more than one functionality. But I am not sure how many... chaals On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Liddy Nevile wrote: I think the distinction between editing code and content editing in a WYSIWYG editor is a bit artificial because in many cases we have a WYSIWYG editor with the code visible and flip between the two - I think we should recognise that DreamWeaver, for one, has a huge market and this will therefore be a VERY common practice -.... I am not sure of the best way to do this either.... but i still think the functionality approach is a good one Liddy -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 22:45:49 UTC