- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:44:02 -0500 (EST)
- To: Liddy Nevile <Liddy.Nevile@motile.net>
- cc: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Yep, I think this is pretty cool. Couple of comments: The 'direct' and indirect' editing bit seemed confusing to me, and I think that talking about "WYSIWYG" editing modes makes more sense. I also think that what we currently call "markup editing tools" are more obviously "document editing tools" (for example Front Page, Word, Dreamweaver, Amaya) or in some cases code editing tools (e.g. HomeSite, Dreamweaver 4, asWedit, Hotdog). Are the code editing tools in the same class as programming tools? I think that the essential difference is that programming tools create something dynamic, but I am not sure if that is important - it only applies as a criterion in a handful of WCAG checkpoints and for 7.2 So I propose that we consider changing the way we use these two categories (markup/document editing and programming/code editing). cheers Charles On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Liddy Nevile wrote: this is much more helpful, I think - well done. -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2002 18:44:08 UTC