Re: AU techs - change "[required]" and explain it

This is fine with me. As is the movement of techniques from 3.3 to 1.4.

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think we should change the word Required, which we use to describe
> techniques that we think are an imprtant part of meeting a checkpoint. I
> would prefer to have "strongly recommended".

-- 
Cheers,
Jan

Received on Thursday, 6 December 2001 16:07:24 UTC