- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:59:44 -0500 (EST)
- To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Yep, I think this is a good question. Maybe we should rephrase it "do I use ATAG 1.0 or Wombat?" (I think there is a question on "who should use ATAG"). cheers Chaals On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Phill Jenkins wrote: I would like to suggest another question to put at the end after the suggested additional questions: Who should use "Wombat"? Authoring tool developers should use "Wombat" now that a public draft is available. This is in anticipation of needing implementation experience before achieving candidate recommendation. Please note that the draft may change etc.etc.etc. If this is not the case, then why point them to ATAG 1.0 if we know all the changes? Regards, Phill Jenkins, (512) 838-4517 IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center 11501 Burnet Rd, Austin TX 78758 http://www.ibm.com/able -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 3 December 2001 11:59:45 UTC