- From: Liddy Nevile <liddy@motile.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 06:06:03 -0500 (EST)
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Liddy Nevile <liddy@motile.net>
- CC: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>, IMS Accessibility Forum <IMS_Accessibility@collegis.org>, Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
> This seems like a good idea. But rather than making it a formal working group > meeting, which would be very difficult uinder W3C process anyway given the > format, I suggest that you make it a BOF or Panel session. I have gone for a workshop on the workshop/tutorial day because otherwise we only get 20 minutes.... but I have said an open session in two parts .... >In looking at > Accessibility metadata I think it is important to involve W3C semantic Web > folks too - there is fairly limited expertise in the area within WAI, and it > would be good to have both areas of W3C talking about it. As far as I can > tell this would in fact make it more open to WAI working groups than a > working group meeting would be, and while it wouldn't have the ability to > make decisions on behalf of a working group, it would be able to produce > proposals that could be well-represented and shold be able to be ratified as > decisions of working groups if there is broad agreement. seems like good reasoning to me - the DC people know a bit too ...
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 06:07:05 UTC