- From: Dave Peterson <davep@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 21:18:35 -0400
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 8:47 AM 7/17/97, Dan Connolly wrote: >Bert looked into this, and he came up with: >clearer if Bison had accepted some common notations for grammars. The >grammar that is actually intended is as follows: > >document: prolog element misc*; >prolog: VERSION? ENCODING? misc*; >misc: COMMENT | attribute_decl; >attribute_decl: ATTDEF NAME attribute+ ENDDEF; >element: START attribute* empty_or_content; >empty_or_content: SLASH CLOSE | CLOSE content END NAME? CLOSE; >content: (DATA | misc | element)*; >attribute: NAME (EQ VALUE)?; Attribute declarations outside the prolog? I hope not. Dave Peterson SGMLWorks! davep@acm.org
Received on Saturday, 19 July 1997 21:17:38 UTC