- From: <lee@sq.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 97 23:44:15 EST
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
> Let us make it simple. My proposal: > > xml syntax > xml link (or xml hypertext) > xml stylesheet I would favour link over hypertext, since a link is only part of hypertext. I would favour xml styles over stylesheet, because I think style sheet may have connotations of simple proprty-based styles to many people, esp. those unfamiliar with products like DynaText or Adept. I would favour xml base or xml core or just xml over xml syntax, to emphasis that it isn't optional. But I strongly agree that all the language must be simple, down to earth, practical and nor call a spade un chat, appeler chaque chose par son nom, as my HyTime phrase book has it. But Cotgrave saith, Il faut perdre vn veron pour pesche vn saulmon [s.v. Pescher(2)], which is, Somewhat must be lost that much may be gotten. The simple-sounding shall inherit the link ends of the earth. Lee
Received on Monday, 27 January 1997 23:44:38 UTC