- From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 13:05:11 -0500
- To: W3C-SGML-WG@www10.w3.org
At 11:37 AM 1/24/97, Lou Burnard wrote: >Is there a better place such enquiries should be referred to? Is the XML Q&A >document or an expansion of it available at a web site somewhere? Am I right in >assuming that this list does *not* want to consume even more bandwidth fielding >queries about done deals than it already has on procedural rules? I think we need an XML public discussion list, at least for a while. I think this has worked well for the TEI. I'm not sure when such a thing should start though. Once it has, every piece of XML literature needs to have the address blazoned on it though. That Q&A from the conference was excellent and should certainly be on the web. This list is not the place. I don't know about the rest of you, but I've dropped comp.text.sgml, except for occasional peeks every few months or so. -- David I am not a number. I am an undefined character. _________________________________________ David Durand dgd@cs.bu.edu \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams --------------------------------------------\ http://dynamicDiagrams.com/ MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________
Received on Friday, 24 January 1997 12:58:24 UTC