- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 23 Jan 1997 22:31:25 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
Paul Prescod writes: If I want to willingly override your "link behaviour specification" to make your document not behave or look right, how is that any different than doing the same in a stylesheet? What if I define a stylesheet that displays "IMPORTANT-NOTICES" in 0 point font. The effect is the same. Your text is lost, it is my "behaviour specification" (stylesheet's) fault. Same as buying a chainsaw and throwing away the instruction book, then claiming you didn't know it was dangerous to try to hold the blade while it was running. I think you have convinced me that we should predefine a "Legal" link type (or link type attribute??) that says that the legal meaning of this document changes if the link is not followed. That Ping. Get-Rich-Quick scam #97. Your lawyer has been notified :-) I like the concept but the terminology frightens me. ///Peter
Received on Thursday, 23 January 1997 17:31:39 UTC