W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > January 1997

Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions

From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 13:48:47 -0500
Message-Id: <v02130509af0d60c55522@[]>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
At 7:46 AM 1/23/97, Terry Allen wrote:
>I wrote:
>>Put another way, I need to be able to bind link behavior to my document,
>and I want to be able to describe relationships  that do not map
>to behaviors.
>I meant "behaviors that do not map to relationships" (also).

   As I noted, this is fundamentally against the "SGML" way. This argument
is already over for document processing (at least in this group). We need
not repeat it for link processing.

   Both links and document elements represent fuzzy "human-semantic" items
that can be processed in different ways in different contexts.

  -- David

I am not a number. I am an undefined character.
David Durand              dgd@cs.bu.edu  \  david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________
Received on Thursday, 23 January 1997 13:41:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:06 UTC