- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@www10.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1997 15:30:55 -0400
- To: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
Peter Flynn wrote: > > Can't we get this > > list server changed to set the "Reply-to:" header to point to the list? > > I second this. It should be the default behavior for any list: if one > holds a group discussion, then it is reasonable to assume that any reply > is targeted at the group rather the individual. The conventional wisdom is very much to the contrary. The following widely-cited article explains: =========== ``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful Chip Rosenthal <chip@unicom.com> $Id: reply-to-harmful.html,v 1.9 1996/07/20 03:36:29 chip Exp $ An Earnest Plea to Mailing List Administrators http://www.miranova.com/~steve/reply-to-harmful.html =========== -- Daniel W. Connolly We believe in the interconnectedness of all things" W3C Architecture Area Lead PGP: EDF8 A8E4 F3BB 0F3C FD1B 7BE0 716C FF21 <connolly@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 1997 14:31:06 UTC