W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > January 1997

Re: XML-Link

From: W. Eliot Kimber <eliot@isogen.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1997 09:54:22 -0900
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970107095245.010b44f4@uu10.psi.com>
To: digitome@iol.ie (Digitome Ltd.), w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
At 11:03 AM 1/7/97 +0000, Digitome Ltd. wrote:
>If mapping Alink to the FigRef element type and/or activating different
>link sets requires non-validating XML browsers to parse DTDs as well I think
>we can push back the Beta dates that much further...

But it doesn't--the mapping can always be in the instance (possibly on
first occurrence of the mapped element types as discussed earlier).

>Finally, at the risk of being branded a blasphemer, I think that
>
><?XML-LINK ALink FigRef,XRef>
>
>needs to be comprehensively shown to be silly before I can get it out of
>my head:-)

This is really just a form of "DTD summary".  How is it different from:

<!DOCTYPE MyDoc [
<!ATTLIST (FigRef,Xref)  -xml-link NAME #FIXED "alink" >
]>

Assuming that XML allows multiple attribute list declarations for element
types? (This ability is currently provided in the extended meta-DTD syntax
defined in the HyTime TC and is on the fast-track for addition to SGML as
part of the upcoming revision, if not before.)

Cheers,

E.
--
W. Eliot Kimber (eliot@isogen.com) 
Senior SGML Consulting Engineer, Highland Consulting
2200 North Lamar Street, Suite 230, Dallas, Texas 75202
+1-214-953-0004 +1-214-953-3152 fax
http://www.isogen.com (work) http://www.drmacro.com (home)
"Rats in the morning, rats in the afternoon...if they don't go away, I'll be
re-educated soon..."                 --Austin Lounge Lizards, "1984 Blues"
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 1997 10:56:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:06 UTC