Saturday, 1 February 1997
- text/xml volunteers needed
- XML catalog draft
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology
Friday, 31 January 1997
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology
- Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It?
- Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology
- New XML-Link draft with revised terminology
- Subject headings
- 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost)
- Re: 1.a: Use Elements?
- Section 0: Naming
- 1.5: Discuss link characteristics?
- 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal?
- 1.4 e: ordinality of directionality
- 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends
- 1.4 d: Address terminology
- 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology
- 1.3, Notation: SGML? Reference Concrete?
- 1.1.a Formatting Issues Out of Scope?
- 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It?
- 1.b: Excluded relationships
- 1.a: Use Elements?
- ERB publishes discussion framework and vote schedule for XML-Link
- Re: Anchor terminology
- Re: Sample Question is irrelevant
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
Thursday, 30 January 1997
Friday, 31 January 1997
Thursday, 30 January 1997
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Entity and Element Addressing
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Entity and Element Addressing
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Entity and Element Addressing
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Sample Question
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Sample Question
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Redirect
- Re: Anchor terminology
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Anchor terminology
- Re: Entity Ignorance
- Re: Anchor terminology
- XML FAQ
- Re: Anchor terminology
Wednesday, 29 January 1997
- Re: Anchor terminology
- XML linking (my draft comments)
- Re: What's a Referrer?
- Re: TEI xptrs as URLs?
- Re: Entity and Element Addressing
- Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available
- Re: Anchor terminology
- Re: Entity Ignorance
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Entity and Element Addressing
- Re: XML for beginners
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Entity Ignorance
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: 'XML browser'
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Entity Ignorance
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Entity Ignorance
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: 'XML browser'
- Re: Entity and Element Addressing
- Entity Ignorance
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: XML for beginners
- Re: What's a Referrer?
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Entity and Element Addressing
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Entity and Element Addressing
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Anchor terminology
Tuesday, 28 January 1997
- Entity and Element Addressing
- Re: TEI xptrs as URLs?
- Re: TEI xptrs as URLs?
- What's a Referrer?
- Re: Anchor terminology
- Re: TEI xptrs as URLs?
- Re: Production 21 (and others)
- Re: Anchor terminology
- Re: Anchor terminology
- TEI xptrs as URLs?
- Re: Anchor terminology
Saturday, 25 January 1997
Tuesday, 28 January 1997
- 'XML browser'
- Re: Anchor terminology
- Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available
- Re: Anchor terminology
- Anchor terminology
- RE: Name for XML-LINK (Was: Re: Initial draft of XML-Link...)
- Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available
- Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available
Monday, 27 January 1997
- RE: Name for XML-LINK (Was: Re: Initial draft of XML-Link...)
- Re: XML for beginners
- Extended Link Groups and Link Chaining
- Re: Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available
- Re: name for xml-link
- Re: xmllink conformance
- name for xml-link
- xmllink conformance
- Re: Name for XML-LINK (Was: Re: Initial draft of XML-Link...)
- Name for XML-LINK (Was: Re: Initial draft of XML-Link...)
- Initial draft of XML-Link spec now available
Sunday, 26 January 1997
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Taxonomy, Link Relationships - where does it all fit?
- Off topic (Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets)
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
Saturday, 25 January 1997
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Taxonomy, Link Relationships - where does it all fit?
- Taxonomy, Link Relationships - where does it all fit?
- Using Java to identify link types
- Using Java to identify link types
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
Friday, 24 January 1997
- XML for beginners
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: something completely different
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: something completely different
- Re: Taxonomy List
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- something completely different
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Taxonomy List
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
Thursday, 23 January 1997
Friday, 24 January 1997
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Base
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
Thursday, 23 January 1997
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Base
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Base
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions (3 CCs deleted)
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship types
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Relationship types
- Re: Base
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Base
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Base
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Base
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
Wednesday, 22 January 1997
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Base
- Re: Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Re: Base
- Relationship Taxonomy Questions
- Status of XML-LINK strawman
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Base
- Re: Base
- Re: Base
- Re: Breathing together (Was: Re: Multi-headed indirect links)
- Breathing together (Was: Re: Multi-headed indirect links)
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- proposal process replies
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: Base
- Re: Base
Tuesday, 21 January 1997
- Base
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: proposal process
- Re: proposal process
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: proposal process
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: proposal process
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- proposal process
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: Slight change to XMLDecl productions...
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Multi-headed indirect links
- Multi-headed indirect links
- Archives updated
Monday, 20 January 1997
- Re: Non-HTML URL Examples
- Re: Non-HTML URL Examples
- Non-HTML URL Examples
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
Sunday, 19 January 1997
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: (my last word on) Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Slight change to XMLDecl productions...
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
Saturday, 18 January 1997
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
Friday, 17 January 1997
- Re: (my last word on) Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- (my last word on) Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
Thursday, 16 January 1997
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links [HoTMetaL edit URL dialogue!]
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Slight change to XMLDecl productions...
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
Wednesday, 15 January 1997
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
- Re: Changed comment syntax
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Changed comment syntax
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Changed comment syntax
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
Tuesday, 14 January 1997
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Production 64 in the November spec.
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- back to XML: The "You Babe" problem
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Some XML syntax/semantic thoughts (PI and RMD)
- HyTime and TEI location ladder examples
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links (2 ccs deleted)
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Using HyTime Arcform stuff (was Re: Ephemeral XML?)
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
Monday, 13 January 1997
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
- Re: questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- NXP - Preview
- Re: Addressing....
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
- questions on XML sgml decl's charsets
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links (2 ccs deleted)
- Re: Addressing....
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
Sunday, 12 January 1997
- Re: Ephemeral XML?
- Re: BOS as a term
- Re: BOS as a term
- Ephemeral XML?
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 CCs deleted).
Saturday, 11 January 1997
Sunday, 12 January 1997
Saturday, 11 January 1997
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 CCs deleted).
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
Friday, 10 January 1997
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Can we be more concrete?
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links (3 CCs removed)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: DTDless instances
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links (3 CCs removed)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 ccs' to Jon's address deleted)
Thursday, 9 January 1997
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 ccs' to Jon's address deleted)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links (3 CCs removed)
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (3 CC's deleted)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 ccs' to Jon's address deleted)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (3 CC's deleted)
- Re: List configuration (2 more CC's deleted)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion (2 ccs' to Jon's address deleted)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Can we be more concrete? (3 cc's deleted from two headers)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Can we be more concrete? (3 cc's deleted from two headers)
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: List configuration
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Addressing....
- Re: (Final?) new term: "XML BOS"
- Re: # or ? in URLS (was BOS confusion)
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: Addressing....
- Re: List configuration
- Re: Can we be more concrete?
- Re: # or ? in URLS (was BOS confusion)
Wednesday, 8 January 1997
- Re: Addressing....
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: Permitting non-indirect links
- Permitting non-indirect links
- Re: List configuration
- Re: Addressing....
- (Final?) new term: "XML BOS"
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Addressing....
- Re: Addressing....
- Re: # or ? in URLS (was BOS confusion)
- Re: List configuration
- Addressing....
- Two requests
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- List configuration
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: URLs/MIME only?
- Re: Can we be more concrete?
- Re: URLs/MIME only?
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Can we be more concrete?
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
Tuesday, 7 January 1997
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: XML-Link
- Re: XML-Link
- Re: XML-Link
- Re: XML-Link
- Re: XML-Link
- XML-Link
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re:Link Indirection
- Re: Problems with WD-xml-961114 (productions)
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Radical cure for BOS confusion
Monday, 6 January 1997
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: URLs/MIME only?
Tuesday, 7 January 1997
Monday, 6 January 1997
- Radical cure for BOS confusion
- Re: Link Indirection
- Re:Link Indirection
- Re: Link Indirection
- Re:Link Indirection
- Announcing Lark, an XML Processor
- Re: Link Indirection
- Re: Link Indirection
- Re:Link Indirection
Sunday, 5 January 1997
- Re:Link Indirection
- Re:Link Indirection
- Re:Link Indirection
- Re:Link Indirection
- Re: Link Indirection
- Re:Link Indirection
- Re: Link indirection
Saturday, 4 January 1997
- Re: Link indirection
- Re: Link indirection
- Re: Link indirection
- Link indirection
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
Friday, 3 January 1997
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- New members; archives updated
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: My House of Sticks XML Link Proposal
- Re: My House of Sticks XML Link Proposal
- My House of Sticks XML Link Proposal
Thursday, 2 January 1997
- Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues
- Re: URLs/MIME only?
- XML Link Sticks Proposal
- Re:Can we be more concrete...
- Re: URLs/MIME only?
- Re: URLs/MIME only?
- Re:Can we be more concrete...
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]
- Charter amendment: hypertext experts
- XML Phase II co-editors
- Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues
- Re: [dgd@cs.bu.edu: BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict)]