- From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 08:49:47 -0500
- To: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM (Jon Bosak), w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 10:54 PM 11/26/96 -0800, Jon Bosak wrote: >Of course it's not technically incorrect. One of the reasons for >using XML is to enable every imaginable variety of output treatments. >You are perfectly free to use whatever output process specification >you want. I think Len is asking if it is technically or politically valid to *require* conforming XML browsers to support DSSSL. If that is not our goal, then he probably does not mind that we will refine DSSSL-O, "while we are all together." I think that the quote that has us a little confused is: "Personally, I think that the only strategy that makes sense here is the full frontal attack: enable dsssl-o processing through plug-ins or applets and insist that real XML browsers are browsers with dsssl-o capabilities. " Do you mean "insist as a set of users that this is what we want" or "insist as a standards group that this is what is conforming?" Paul Prescod
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 1996 08:47:18 UTC