- From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 19:06:25 -0800
- To: murray@spyglass.com
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
[Murray Altheim:] | Isn't Jade written for full DSSSL functionality? Just as one of the chief | concerns of using SP in an application is the size of the code, wouldn't a | Jade-o or Jade-Lite really be what we need here? | | If the compiled code for the stylesheet engine is an order of magnitude* | larger than the XML parser, then a simplified toolkit is absolutely | necessary if we expect dsssl-o support in applications. Jade is *not* written for full DSSSL functionality; it's not even close. It's dsssl-o with a few recent extensions. But it may indeed be necessary to cut it back in implementations. The need to find out is one of the reasons that I am trying to encourage some development. Jon
Received on Monday, 25 November 1996 22:08:30 UTC