- From: <DAVEP@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Nov 1996 18:06:42 -0600 (CDT)
- To: jenglish@crl.com
- Cc: W3C-SGML-WG@w3.org
<jenglish@crl.com> (Joe English) recently wrote: >Since most SGML users will have to rewrite their DTDs >to make them XML-able anyway, leaving out the omitted >tag minimization parameter doesn't seem like that big >a deal... But rewriting them so that the content models obey the restrictions is a one-shot thing, and then you can continue to deal with those documents using the new DTD with its new content models in both SGML and XML systems. The point of Eve's proposal is to avoid having to continue to maintain both versions. That to me _does_ "seem like that big a deal...". Dave Peterson SGMLWorks! davep@acm.org
Received on Saturday, 2 November 1996 19:06:44 UTC