w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from December 1996 by date

Tuesday, 31 December 1996

Re: BOS clarification? Steven R. Newcomb
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Steven R. Newcomb
Re:Can we be more concrete... David G. Durand
Re: URLs/MIME only? David G. Durand
BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict) David G. Durand
Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues David G. Durand
Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues David G. Durand
Re: Suggestion: A link model David G. Durand
Re: URLs/MIME only? Gavin Nicol
Re: URLs/MIME only? Gavin Nicol
Re: URLs/MIME only? W. Eliot Kimber
Re:Can we be more concrete... W. Eliot Kimber
Re:Can we be more concrete... Digitome Ltd.
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Martin Bryan
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Martin Bryan
Re: Anchor terminology Martin Bryan
Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues Martin Bryan
Re: Link Behaviors Gavin Nicol
Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues Gavin Nicol
Re: URLs/MIME only? Gavin Nicol
Re: Can we be more concrete? len bullard

Monday, 30 December 1996

Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Steven R. Newcomb

Tuesday, 31 December 1996

Re: Can we be more concrete? W. Eliot Kimber

Monday, 30 December 1996

Re: Can we be more concrete? Terry Allen
Re: Can we be more concrete? len bullard
Re: Anchors Aweigh Gavin Nicol
Re: Can we be more concrete? W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Suggestion: A link model W. Eliot Kimber
Re: BOS clarification? W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Can we be more concrete? len bullard
Re: Suggestion: A link model David G. Durand
BOS clarification? Terry Allen
Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues W. Eliot Kimber
Policy in XML (concrete) Terry Allen
Re: Anchor terminology Peter Flynn
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Steven R. Newcomb
Re: Can we be more concrete? W. Eliot Kimber
Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues David G. Durand
Re: Suggestion: A link model W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Can we be more concrete? len bullard
Re: Can we be more concrete? W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Link Behaviors len bullard
Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues W. Eliot Kimber
Problems with WD-xml-961114 (productions) Norbert H. MIKULA
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) David G. Durand
Grove plans? David G. Durand
Link Behaviors David G. Durand
Re: Suggestion: A link model David G. Durand
Re: Can we be more concrete? len bullard
More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues David G. Durand
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard
Re: Can we be more concrete? W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Anchors Aweigh Gavin Nicol
Re: Anchors Aweigh Gavin Nicol
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Martin Bryan
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Martin Bryan
Re: Can we be more concrete? W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Can we be more concrete? W. Eliot Kimber
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) Joe English
Re: Anchor terminology Ralph Ferris
Re: Can we be more concrete? len bullard
Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness W. Eliot Kimber

Sunday, 29 December 1996

Can we be more concrete? Tim Bray
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines len bullard
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard

Monday, 30 December 1996

Re: Suggestion: A link model W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Suggestion: A link model W. Eliot Kimber

Sunday, 29 December 1996

Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Steven R. Newcomb
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Steven R. Newcomb
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines David G. Durand
Re: Anchor terminology Peter Flynn
Re: Anchors Aweigh Peter Flynn
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Terry Allen
Re: URLs/MIME only? Terry Allen
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) Alex Milowski
Kill the BOS of XML Martin Bryan
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Martin Bryan
Re: URLs/MIME only? [was Anchors Aweigh] len bullard
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) James Clark
Re: URLs/MIME only? David G. Durand
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines David G. Durand
URLs/MIME only? [was Anchors Aweigh] Terry Allen
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Terry Allen
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard

Saturday, 28 December 1996

Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard
Suggestion: A link model David G. Durand
Re: Anchors Aweigh David G. Durand
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) David G. Durand
Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines David G. Durand
Re: Anchors Aweigh Terry Allen
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) David G. Durand
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Ralph Ferris
unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines Steven R. Newcomb
XML and groves/property sets Robin Cover
Re: Anchors Aweigh W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard
Re: Anchors Aweigh Martin Bryan
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard
Re: Anchors Aweigh Gavin Nicol
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) Gavin Nicol
Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness Lou Burnard
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) len bullard
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Anchor terminology W. Eliot Kimber
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) W. Eliot Kimber

Friday, 27 December 1996

Re: Anchors Aweigh David G. Durand
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) David G. Durand
Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) Jon Bosak
Re: Anchors Aweigh Gavin Nicol
Re: Anchors Aweigh len bullard
Re: Anchors Aweigh Gavin Nicol
Re: Anchor terminology Martin Bryan

Thursday, 26 December 1996

Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) David G. Durand
Re: Anchor terminology David G. Durand
Re: Anchors Aweigh Jon Bosak
Re: Anchor terminology Jon Bosak
Re: Anchor terminology Jon Bosak
Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Anchor terminology Peter Flynn
Anchors Aweigh len bullard
clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) Jon Bosak
Anchor terminology Jon Bosak

Tuesday, 24 December 1996

Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Martin Bryan
Re: Richer & richer semantics? papresco

Monday, 23 December 1996

Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Terry Allen

Tuesday, 24 December 1996

Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) W. Eliot Kimber

Monday, 23 December 1996

Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Terry Allen
Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness W. Eliot Kimber
Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness W. Eliot Kimber
locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness Derek Denny-Brown
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Steven R. Newcomb
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Derek Denny-Brown
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Terry Allen
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Terry Allen
Re: Transclusion Terry Allen
Re: Summary of New HyTime Features in the TC W. Eliot Kimber
HTML vs. XML arguments, relevance of Jon Bosak
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Summary of New HyTime Features in the TC Charles F. Goldfarb
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Gavin Nicol
Re: Richer & richer semantics? Gavin Nicol
Re: Hyperlink behavior Gavin Nicol
Re: Transclusion Gavin Nicol
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Peter Flynn
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Steven R. Newcomb
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Tim Bray

Sunday, 22 December 1996

Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Steven R. Newcomb
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Steven R. Newcomb
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Tim Bray
Re: Transclusion Len Bullard
Re: Richer & richer semantics? papresco
Re: Transclusion Peter Flynn

Saturday, 21 December 1996

anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) Steven R. Newcomb
Re: Hyperlink behavior Peter Flynn
Re: Transclusion Terry Allen
Transclusion Tim Bray
Re: Richer & richer semantics? Keith M. Corbett
Re: Richer & richer semantics? Terry Allen
Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. Len Bullard
Re: Richer & richer semantics? W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. Len Bullard
Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. Martin Bryan
Richer & richer semantics? Tim Bray
Re: Hyperlinks: MPRDV Len Bullard

Friday, 20 December 1996

Re: Hyperlink behavior Gavin Nicol
Re: Hyperlinks: MPRDV Gavin Nicol
Re: Hyperlinks: (1. Background) Jon Bosak
Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Summary of New HyTime Features in the TC W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Hyperlink behavior W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Hyperlinks: 4. link behavior (incl new: 4.3) David G. Durand
Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. David G. Durand
Re: Hyperlinks: (1. Background) David G. Durand
Re: Hyperlinks: 5. link roles David G. Durand
Re: Hyperlinks: MPRDV Tim Bray
Hyperlink behavior David G. Durand
Re: Hyperlinks: MPRDV Martin Bryan
Hyperlinks: MPRDV Tim Bray
Mail test -- please ignore Jon Bosak

Wednesday, 18 December 1996

Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Jon Bosak
Re: Trying to sum up a bit David G. Durand
Another proposal, and a requirement (was Re: Trying to sum up a bit) David G. Durand
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) David G. Durand
ERB decisions on RS/RE and whitespace Tim Bray
Element vs. mixed content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Joe English
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Christopher R. Maden
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Jon Bosak
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Gavin Nicol
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Gavin Nicol
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol

Tuesday, 17 December 1996

Re: Blended Proposal Christopher R. Maden
Re: Blended Proposal Christopher R. Maden
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Christopher R. Maden
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Paul Prescod
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Derek Denny-Brown
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Murray Altheim
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Paul Prescod
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Tim Bray
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Tim Bray
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Paul Prescod
Blended Proposal Paul Prescod
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Paul Grosso
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Paul Prescod
Re: Trying to sum up a bit Bill Smith
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Paul Grosso
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Derek Denny-Brown
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Derek Denny-Brown
Trying to sum up a bit Tim Bray
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Jon Bosak
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Joe English
Re: Grosso whitespace proposal Paul Prescod
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Derek Denny-Brown
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Derek Denny-Brown
Apology (was Re: Parsing technology) David G. Durand
Re: Parsing technology (was Re: Grosso whitespace proposal) Paul Grosso
Another requirement qualification. (*Not* a proposal, please read!) David G. Durand
Parsing technology (was Re: Grosso whitespace proposal) David G. Durand
Re: Grosso whitespace proposal Paul Grosso
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Christopher R. Maden
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Grosso
Grosso whitespace proposal Paul Grosso
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Peter Flynn
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Paul Prescod
Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Jon Bosak
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Jon Bosak
Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Derek Denny-Brown

Monday, 16 December 1996

Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Joe English
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Christopher R. Maden
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 Paul Grosso
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Grosso
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 Len Bullard
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 David Durand
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Peter Flynn
Maximimum line lengths Tim Bray
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Peter Flynn
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Len Bullard
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 Len Bullard

Sunday, 15 December 1996

Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Peter Flynn
Re: XML and stylesheets Peter Flynn
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Paul Prescod
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Peter Flynn
Re: XML and stylesheets Paul Prescod
Re: XML and stylesheets Peter Flynn
Re: re ERB discussion of public identifiers Peter Flynn
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Paul Grosso
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 Paul Grosso
Attempt at listing requirements, constraints and proposal fragments David G. Durand
Re: Things we should not forget... Jon Bosak
XML and stylesheets Paul Prescod
RE: Understanding the Paoli proposal Paul Prescod
Re: re ERB discussion of public identifiers David Durand
Re: re ERB discussion of public identifiers Terry Allen
Re: Understanding the Paoli proposal Peter Flynn
Re: re ERB discussion of public identifiers Peter Flynn

Saturday, 14 December 1996

An example of socats and nsgmls Alex Milowski
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Alex Milowski
RE: Understanding the Paoli proposal Jean Paoli
Re: Public IDs for notations in XML Len Bullard
Re: Public IDs for notations in XML Terry Allen
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
re ERB discussion of public identifiers Terry Allen
Understanding the Paoli proposal Paul Prescod
Re Delenda est summary Paul Prescod
Whitespace and full-text indexers Paul Prescod
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Jean Paoli
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Jean Paoli
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol

Friday, 13 December 1996

Saturday, 14 December 1996

Things we should not forget... David G. Durand

Friday, 13 December 1996

Whitespace details David G. Durand
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Michael Sperberg-McQueen
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) David G. Durand
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) David G. Durand
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) lee@sq.com
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Tim Bray
RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) Jean Paoli
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: RS/RE, again (quite sorry) Derek Denny-Brown
RS/RE: Decision point? David G. Durand
Musing on the philosophy of FPIs David G. Durand
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod

Thursday, 12 December 1996

Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) lee@sq.com
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Christopher R. Maden
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) David Durand
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Christopher R. Maden
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) streich@austin.sar.slb.com
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: comments lee@sq.com
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) lee@sq.com
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) lee@sq.com
Element vs. mixed content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) Joe English
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers David G. Durand
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers David G. Durand
comments David G. Durand
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) David G. Durand
Re: Public IDs for notations in XML David G. Durand
RE: Public IDs for notations in XML Ken Holman
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 Martin Bryan
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 Martin Bryan
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Eve Maler
Re: Public IDs for notations in XML lee@sq.com
Re: XML and HTML Interoperability Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: Public IDs for notations in XML Len Bullard
Public IDs for notations in XML W. Eliot Kimber
Re: XML and HTML Interoperability Jon Bosak
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 Joe English

Wednesday, 11 December 1996

Re: XML and HTML Interoperability Christopher R. Maden
public identifiers: "interchange XML" Paul Prescod
Please please please Tim Bray
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Paul Prescod
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Murray Altheim
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Eve L. Maler
XML and HTML Interoperability Murray Altheim
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Peter Flynn
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers lee@sq.com
Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers Keith M. Corbett
RS/RE Delenda Est compromise? Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Gavin Nicol
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) Paul Prescod
Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) lee@sq.com
RE: ERB discussion of public identifiers Ken Holman
Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 lee@sq.com
ERB discussion of public identifiers Tim Bray
RS/RE, again (sorry) Tim Bray
simplifying comments in SGML '97 Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: SPREAD public entity set for ISO 10646 (Re: SDATA, again) David Durand
SPREAD public entity set for ISO 10646 (Re: SDATA, again) Rick Jelliffe
Re: SDATA, again Dave Peterson
Re: SDATA, again Terry Allen
Re: SDATA, again Michael Sperberg-McQueen

Tuesday, 10 December 1996

Re: SDATA, again Terry Allen
XML in Seybold Jon Bosak
SDATA, again Jon Bosak
Re: SDATA, again David G. Durand
Re: SDATA, again Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: SDATA, again Dave Peterson
Re: SDATA, again Gavin Nicol
Re: SDATA, again Deborah A. Lapeyre
Re: SDATA, again Len Bullard
Re: SDATA, again David G. Durand

Monday, 9 December 1996

Re: SDATA, again Dave Peterson
Re: SDATA, again Dave Peterson
Re: SDATA, again lee@sq.com
Re: SDATA, again Jon Bosak
Re: SDATA, again Tim Bray
Re: SDATA, again W. Eliot Kimber
Re: SDATA, again David J Birnbaum
SDATA, again David G. Durand
Public Identifiers Tim Bray
An application of FPIs Jon Bosak

Saturday, 7 December 1996

Re: SGML and XML Dave Peterson

Friday, 6 December 1996

Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) Terry Allen
Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) David G. Durand
Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) Deborah A. Lapeyre
Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) Paul Prescod
Re: Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs David G. Durand
Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) W. Eliot Kimber

Thursday, 5 December 1996

RE: FPIs to URNs Paul Prescod
Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) Paul Prescod
RE: FPIs to URNs David G. Durand
Re: FPIs to URNs Ron Daniel
Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) Derek Denny-Brown
RE: FPIs to URNs lee@sq.com
Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) David G. Durand
RE: FPIs to URNs Ken Holman
Re: FPIs to URNs lee@sq.com

Wednesday, 4 December 1996

Re: FPIs to URNs Paul Grosso
[rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov: Re: FPIs to URNs] Jon Bosak
Re: FPIs to URNs Derek Denny-Brown
Re: FPIs to URNs Ron Daniel
Re: FPIs to URNs Ron Daniel
Re: FPIs to URNs Murray Altheim
Re: FPIs to URNs Murray Altheim
Re: FPIs to URNs Ron Daniel
Re: FPIs to URNs Paul Grosso
Re: MIME type for XML Gavin Nicol
Re: FPIs to URNs lee@sq.com
Re: MIME type for XML lee@sq.com

Tuesday, 3 December 1996

FPIs Deborah A. Lapeyre
Re: FPIs to URNs Jon Bosak
FPIs to URNs Jon Bosak
Re: Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs Jon Bosak
Re: Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs David G. Durand
Re: SGML and XML David G. Durand
Re: Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs Martin Bryan
Re: MIME type for XML Gavin Nicol
Re: MIME type for XML Murray Altheim
Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs Paul Prescod
Re: MIME type for XML Terry Allen
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Len Bullard
Re: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup Len Bullard
Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs Ken Holman

Monday, 2 December 1996

Re: MIME type for XML Murray Altheim
Re: SGML and XML Gavin Nicol
Re: SGML and XML Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup Paul Prescod
RE: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup Ken Holman
RE: Client-side-resolved Indirection Ken Holman
Re: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup Gavin Nicol
Re: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup David G. Durand
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection David G. Durand
FPIs in XML Terry Allen
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection David G. Durand
Re: SGML and XML David G. Durand
Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup lee@sq.com
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Terry Allen
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Paul Prescod
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Deborah A. Lapeyre
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Deborah A. Lapeyre
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Paul Prescod
RE: Simple solution? Pub. Idents. vs URN. Deborah A. Lapeyre
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Jon Bosak
Re: Stylesheets Jon Bosak
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection Paul Prescod
Re: MIME type for XML Christopher R. Maden
Client-side-resolved Indirection Ken Holman
Stylesheets Per-Ake Ling UAB/K/U
New members; archives updated Jon Bosak

Sunday, 1 December 1996

Re: FPIs Jon Bosak
Re: FPIs Jon Bosak
Re: MIME type for XML Jon Bosak
Re: SGML and XML Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Characters in XML Terry Allen
Re: Revised XML registration Jon Bosak
Re: Formal System Identifiers Paul Prescod
Re: Formal System Identifiers Charles F. Goldfarb
Re: FPI's in NOTATION declarations Charles F. Goldfarb
Re: FPIs Charles F. Goldfarb

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 1996 19:08:36 UTC