- From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 11:45:03 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>, Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Aaron and Graham, Well done and thank you very much for seeing this through the process. Can I take it your are now done? Has the RFC been published yet, in which case can I have a reference for the WG home page. Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Graham Klyne > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:01 AM > To: Aaron Swartz > Cc: RDF core WG > Subject: Fwd: Document Action: 'application/rdf+xml Media > Type Registration' to Informational RFC > > > Aaron, > > This is the formal announcement. > > I would suggest forwarding a copy (or URI) of your XML source code to > <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> (with a copy of or clear > reference to this > announcement, or at least to the approved Internet Draft > name). According > to [1][2], the RFC Editor can use this to ease internal > publishing process. > > What will probably happen now is that things go quiet for a > while, then you > will receive an email from the RFC Editor giving you 48 hours > to review the > document edited to its expected final form as an RFC. > Sometimes, errors do > creep in during the RFC Editor process, so it's worth > checking, though with > a simple document like this I don't anticipate problems. > > The RFC editor maintains a publicly visible queue at [3]. > > Thanks for your prompt turnaround over the past few weeks. > > #g > -- > > [1] > http://xml.resource.org/pipermail/xml2rfc/2003-November/000957.html > > [2] > http://xml.resource.org/pipermail/xml2rfc/2003-September/000794.html > > [3] http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html > > > >From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> > >To: IETF-Announce:; > >Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, > > RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> > >Subject: Document Action: 'application/rdf+xml Media Type > > Registration' to Informational RFC > >Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:22:43 -0400 > >Sender: ietf-announce-admin@ietf.org > > > >The IESG has approved the following document: > > > >- 'application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration ' > > <draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-05.txt> as an > Informational RFC > > > >This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the > product of an > >IETF Working Group. > > > >The IESG contact person is Scott Hollenbeck. > > > >Technical Summary > > > >This document describes a media type (application/rdf+xml) for use > >with the XML serialization of the Resource Description Framework > >(RDF). RDF is a language designed to support the Semantic Web, by > >facilitating resource description and data exchange on the Web. RDF > >provides common structures that can be used for interoperable data > >exchange and follows the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) design > >principles of interoperability, evolution, and decentralization. > > > >Working Group Summary > > > >The document has been reviewed by the W3C RDFcore working > group, which > >has reached consensus on the request to publish this document. The > >document was also presented for review on the IETF-types list; no > >comments were received. > > > >Protocol Quality > > > >Scott Hollenbeck has reviewed the spec for the IESG. He has > confirmed > >that there are multiple producers of data served as > application/rdf+xml. > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >IETF-Announce mailing list > >IETF-Announce@ietf.org > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > > ------------ > Graham Klyne > For email: > http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact >
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2004 06:47:11 UTC