Re: [Fwd: XML-Reference]

Dan Brickley wrote:

> * Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> [2004-03-17 17:38-0600]
> 
>>>Do we have our first erratum?
>>>
>>I think we should say that the 1988 reference is genuine, but not widely 
>>known.
>>
> 
> How annoying. I just trawled back through old versions of the spec:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/ (CR of March 2000) has it.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-schema-19990303/ (PR of March 1999) didn't.
> 
> Took 4 years for someone to spot the typo. Wonder what else will have 
> surfaced by 2008...


That Microsoft had patented that 1988 version of XML?


> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 08:36:25 UTC