- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 16:50:29 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Sandro, I've spent a few hours looking into them and
haven't found "anything terribly wrong with them" :)
Nice work!
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Sandro Hawke
<sandro@w3.org> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Sent by: cc:
www-webont-wg-req Subject: RDF and OWL "REC" documents
uest@w3.org
06/02/2004 23:17
Would all editors please look over their docs and/or diffs and let me
know ASAP if there's anything terribly wrong with them? I've done
various edits to get links to point to the right places (and in a few
cases as requested) and it's possible I broke something in the
process. The cost of changes is very high, but if I broke anything,
I do want to fix it.
RDF:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/diffs/20031215-20040210/
OWL:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/diffs
Note that all the links like
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/staging/$shortname
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-$shortname-20030117
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/STAGE-$shortname
are fine; they will be rewritten to point to the frozen-in-time TR
documents as the documents are moved.
-- sandro
Received on Saturday, 7 February 2004 10:50:46 UTC