Friday, 31 October 2003
- Re: LC2 semantics proof appendix
 - [closed] Re: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules
 - Re: schema and semantics differ: range of rdf:predicate?
 - RDFCore teleconference: 2003-10-31
 - Re: MIME type regostration notes
 - Re: LC2 semantics proof appendix
 - Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
 - rdf.rdf
 - Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
 - Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
 - Re: schema and semantics differ: range of rdf:predicate?
 - Re: [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - Re: MIME type regostration notes
 - Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
 - Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
 - Re: 2396bis
 - Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
 - Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
 - Re: 2396bis
 - Draft Request to Advance
 - Re: 2396bis
 - Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
 - MIME type regostration notes
 - Re: ISWC Florida Ra! Ra!
 - Re: [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - Re: 2396bis
 - Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
 - Re: rdfcore 2003-10-31 agenda (docs, docs, docs, status, futures...)
 
Thursday, 30 October 2003
- 2396bis
 - ISWC Florida Ra! Ra!
 - non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf
 - schema and semantics differ: range of rdf:predicate?
 - ACTION 20030718#4 done
 - [Fwd: [Fwd: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group]]
 - Re: [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - [closed] Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - Re: rdfcore 2003-10-31 agenda (docs, docs, docs, status, futures...)
 - Re: rdfcore 2003-10-31 agenda (docs, docs, docs, status, futures...)
 - rdfcore 2003-10-31 agenda (docs, docs, docs, status, futures...)
 - RE: test xmlbase/test012
 - Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - Re: test xmlbase/test012
 - Re: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - Re: Call for agenda items
 
Wednesday, 29 October 2003
- Call for agenda items
 - Re: regrets 31st Oct
 - regrets 31st Oct
 - RE: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - test xmlbase/test012
 - RE: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 
Tuesday, 28 October 2003
- RE: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - RE: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - Fwd: N-Triples VS RDF/XML bNode identifiers
 - Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph [was: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules]
 
Monday, 27 October 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: a partial review
 - Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph [was: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules]
 
Sunday, 26 October 2003
Thursday, 23 October 2003
- Re: RDFCore 24 Oct 2003 call CANCELLED Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
 - Re: RDFCore 24 Oct 2003 call CANCELLED Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
 - RDFCore 24 Oct 2003 call CANCELLED Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
 
Wednesday, 22 October 2003
- Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
 - Re: Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
 - Call for agenda items - possible cancellation of this weeks telecon
 
Saturday, 18 October 2003
Friday, 17 October 2003
Thursday, 16 October 2003
- Re: entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
 - Re: Telecon 17 Nov 2003 CANCELLED
 - Telecon 17 Nov 2003 CANCELLED
 - Minutes, 2003-10-10
 
Wednesday, 15 October 2003
- possible Semantic Web panel at W3C AC meeting
 - Re: Regrets for Friday telecon ()
 - RDF Semantics: partial review
 - Re: Regrets for Friday telecon ()
 - entailment-from-inconsistent-graph: new test case request
 - weekly call for agenda items - possibly cancel telecon?
 - Regrets for Friday
 - Regrets for Friday telecon ()
 - Re: Diffs now available
 
Tuesday, 14 October 2003
- Re: Diffs now available
 - disposition of 2nd last call comments doc created
 - [Fwd: Request for PR of Namespaces in XML 1.1]
 - [Fwd: Request for PR for XML 1.1]
 
Monday, 13 October 2003
- Re: semantics proof appendix fixed
 - semantics proof appendix fixed
 - [Fwd: RDFCore 2nd last call announcement]
 - Re: Diffs now available
 - Diffs now available
 
Friday, 10 October 2003
- RE: Assessment of semantics bug: [was: Re: proof bug in semantics]
 - Re: LC2 semantics proof appendix
 - Assessment of semantics bug: [was: Re: proof bug in semantics]
 - Re: LC2 semantics proof appendix
 - Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
 - Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-10
 - LC2 semantics proof appendix
 - proof bug in semantics
 
Thursday, 9 October 2003
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-10
 - Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-10
 - Updated semantics: [[was: Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
 - Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
 - Re: More issues lists links gone
 - Re: normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
 - normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 
Wednesday, 8 October 2003
- Re: testcases LC2 working draft ready
 - testcases LC2 working draft ready
 - regrets 10 October telecon
 - More issues lists links gone
 - Re: Question about semantics spec
 - Re: Lc pub docs
 - Re: Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
 - Re: status of this document template
 - Re: Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
 - Re: Question about semantics spec
 - Re: Lc pub docs
 - Re: Broken/gone RDF LC issue links
 - Re: Broken/gone RDF LC issue links
 - Question about semantics spec
 - another matter entirely
 
Tuesday, 7 October 2003
- Re: primer LC working draft
 - syntax LC2 working draft ready
 - Re: Document crosslinks
 - Lc pub docs
 - Broken/gone RDF LC issue links
 - Re: status of this document template
 - final concepts changes
 - Document crosslinks
 - Re: Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
 - Re: Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
 - Peter's objection to the RDF(S) rules
 
Monday, 6 October 2003
- semantics doc boilerplate OK
 - ACTION 2003-10-03#8 completed
 - primer LC working draft
 - semantics document
 - status of this document template
 - Re: Fw: [closed] xmlsch-11 layering on xml
 - Re: rdf:RDF examples (was Re: Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon)
 - Fw: [closed] xmlsch-11 layering on xml
 - Fw: [closed] xmlsch-10 canonical syntax
 - rdf:RDF examples (was Re: Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon)
 
Sunday, 5 October 2003
Saturday, 4 October 2003
Friday, 3 October 2003
- Re: RDF MIME registration
 - RDF MIME registration
 - Re: Proposed rdf:RDF change
 - RDF semantics document
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Minutes of 2003-10-03 RDFCore WG telcon
 - Re: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
 - Re: Proposed rdf:RDF change
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: htmldiff
 - Proposed rdf:RDF change
 - RE: Internal DTD Examples Invalidate the RDF/XML Documents
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - NFC text in semantics
 - Re: Regrets: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
 - Regrets: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
 - Re: XML Schema response :(
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: list of objections
 - Re: Webont's position w.r.t XML Literal design
 - Re: semantics doc now post-HorrocksPan
 - Re: RDF Semantics WD
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - htmldiff
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 
Thursday, 2 October 2003
Friday, 3 October 2003
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
 - semantics doc now post-HorrocksPan
 - Re: RDF Review
 - Re: RDF Review
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
 
Thursday, 2 October 2003
- Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - RDF Semantics WD
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Webont's position w.r.t XML Literal design
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - RE: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Editor's Draft of RDF/XML updated for 2 Oct 2003
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: test cases wording
 - Re: test cases wording
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - list of objections
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
 - Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
 
Wednesday, 1 October 2003
- Re: revised Primer
 - revised Primer
 - Re: test cases wording
 - Re: Current status of my actions list
 - test cases wording
 - Re: Current status of my actions list
 - Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
 - Re: Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - weekly call for agenda items
 - Fwd "a comment on NFC"
 - Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
 - Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
 - Re: Current status of my actions list
 - Re: Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
 - XML Schema response :(
 - Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
 - Rough draft of datatypes with whitespace text
 - Current status of my actions list
 - Re: collecting objections
 - Re: Proposed modification to syntax re xml:lang