W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2003

typed literals and language tags - suggested sub-agenda

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:51:23 +0200
To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

A:  Option 2
   straw poll:
   "We prefer Option 2 to no change."

If Yes then
     straw poll - we prefer option 1 to option 2     
     straw poll - we prefer option 3 to option 2     
     straw poll - we prefer option 4 to option 2

each with fors, against and strongly against (i.e. would vote against in formal vote).

Chair to put question (option 1,2,3 or 4) based on results of staw polls.

If no to A, then no question is put.



Option 2 is the smallest sensible change, if we prefer the status quo to option 2, then we should do nothing. Otherwise we should decide to go for option 2 or more sophisticated, and then see if we have support for a more sophisticated XMLLiteral solution (options 1, 3 or 4).

Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 05:56:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:22 UTC