- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 07 May 2003 11:23:35 -0500
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 10:40, pat hayes wrote: [...] > >PatH - you bet its trivial to change Owl not to need them - can you > >propose specific text for the change? > > Wherever any part of the OWL-XX syntactic conditions currently > mention triples of the form > > xxx rdf:type rdf:List > > that reference is modified to refer to triples of the form > > xxx rdf:first yyy > or > zzz rdf:rest xxx > or > xxx rdf:rest zzz > > which could all be called 'list triples of xxx' or some such phrase. > A minor edit to the text, no significant change to any actual > conditions. What about the name separation stuff? "the ontologies in O, taken together, provide a type for every individual ID;" -- Web Ontology Language (OWL) Abstract Syntax and Semantics Section 4. Mapping to RDF Graphs http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/mapping.html#4.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-semantics-20030331/mapping.html#4.1 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 12:25:44 UTC